Tag Archives: Horatio Holloway

DUCK

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

Edinburgh Festival Fringe

DUCK at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

“a very personal story in the midst of an institutional one, with plenty of humour and compassion throughout”

Duck is vivid in a way few pieces or storytelling, let alone theatre, manage to be. It tells the story of Ismael β€œSmiles” Akhad, a stereotypically insecure and competitive fifteen year old boy whose whole life revolves around cricket. His ambitions are curtailed, however, by racism amongst the ranks of his private school cricket team, both implicit racism, through his manipulative β€œold boy” cricket coach, Mr Eagles, and explicit racism: the bullying and by-standing of his teammates.

Indeed, the fundamental strength of Maatin’s writing, though there are many strengths, is how nuanced, flawed, redeemable and sympathetic Ismael is. β€œSmiley” is a real talent, but he’s fallible; we never actually see him score anything but ducks (a big fat 0). He’s rambunctious, rebellious, resentful, but nevertheless not blind to the sacrifices of his father, who Qasim Mahmood, the sole actor in the play, performs with similarly wonderful joy and depth. Indeed, it’s the relationship between father and son which acts as the spine of the play; they fight, though both just want the other to be happy. They listen to each other. They want to understand each other, even when the teenage brain makes that understandably hard. The love traceable in this relationship despite the complications makes you root hard for their mutual success despite their faults.

In general, the writing is excellent. It’s never poetic but it never needs to be, because honesty and vivid realism is the order of the day and Maatin executes it with near perfection. Indeed, my performance was stopped halfway through for a tech issue, breaking immersion in the most explicit sense, and yet I never felt detached once it restarted, which is a testament to the breadth and colour of the world Maatin creates. It immerses you immediately and permeates; each character so vividly alive that a short incidental interval can’t possibly make them fade.

Furthermore, Mahmood’s acting is as strong as the writing. From the opening β€œHowzaaaaat?”, the energy never dies; even in the powerful, emotional moments, such as when his father elucidates the reality of xenophobia in England, where silences last longer than dialogue, the intensity of the character and the story never dissipates. The directorial pacing (ImyWyatt Corner) and writing can be thanked in part, but the control and energy Mahmood exhibits is just as significant. He never overdoes it, never loses your attention, and though sometimes the emotional development can feel chaotic and discordant, such are the tortures of a teenage brain.

Alongside this direct talent, the use of tech in the show is outstanding; direct, but executed to perfection. Throughout, two imaginary cricket commentators narrate the ups and downs of Ismael’s experience. Voiceovers can often be tacky and messy, but they’re incredibly sharp here, and we sense that Mahmood knows each one of them – their pace, cadence and rhythm – as well as he knows his live lines. The use of duck sound effects (Holly Khan) is tempered but perfectly timed, and the many simple lighting (Jonathan Chan) changes to convey warm summer days, movie nights and classroom monotony is, at risk of sounding like a broken record, executed perfectly.

The show deals with heavy, important themes throughout – micro aggressive and outward racism, institutional prejudice, and the 7/7 bombings – but never becomes didactic, rather treating each issue with the personal perspective they warrant. Its presentation of the β€œboys club” racism is visceral in its distaste, and the isolation Ismael suffers emits equally so. But regardless, Duck manages to tell a very personal story in the midst of an institutional one, with plenty of humour and compassion throughout. It’s a vivid delight, and I recommend it unreservedly


DUCK at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe – Pleasance Courtyard – Beneath

Reviewed on 21st August 2024

by Horatio Holloway

Photography by Isha Shah (from Arcola Theatre production)

 

 


Duck

Duck

CLICK HERE TO SEE ALL OUR REVIEWS FROM EDINBURGH 2024

 

LA BELLA

β˜…β˜…β˜…Β½

Edinburgh Festival Fringe

LA BELLA at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe

β˜…β˜…β˜…Β½

“Greenhalgh’s writing is phenomenally impressive”

La Bella is the story of a single relationship discoloured, fragmented and exhilarated by the
many others around it. It is the love between Sandro Bottecelli, the charmingly uncharming up-and-coming Renaissance artist and his muse, the ever-conflicted Netta Vespucci, for whom Botticelli feels an affection that seems to transcend usual love or desire. We follow their periodic meetings – the tentative exchanges, moments of intimacy, vulnerability, anger and mourning that colour their relationships’ canvas all the way until its end (and forever after, too).

The chemistry between Honor Calvert (Netta) and Jacob Cordery (Sandro) is palpable from the jump; their push-and-pull between separation and collaboration buzzes with an electricity that leaves no doubt of pull’s eventual victory, though it’s fun to watch the game be played. Calvert is superb throughout, navigating her character’s witty exterior and the existential sadness it cloaks with equally naturalistic and emotive tact. She at points drifts perhaps too quickly to standoffishness, but quickly recovers the nuance that largely embodies her performance. Cordery is equally charismatic and witty, and his every line seems so effortless as a result, which immerses one in their relationship to great effect. Sometimes, this naturalism becomes too total, and certain emotional moments can feel a little wooden and forced, though his final monologue wonderfully captures the sort of longing and strained affection that had otherwise been hiding halfway in the wings.

Abby Greenhalgh’s writing is phenomenally impressive; in her fringe debut, she whisks sections of believable yet sharp dialogue into dynamic shape, quickly tracing, developing and colouring the relationship of her two characters; their insecurities and desires, loves and hates, fears and prejudices. Both voices feel distinct yet connected, and sections where Netta challenges Sandro are particularly powerful. These moments of composite brilliance never quite coalesce into a satisfying whole, however; the narrative functions effectively, but certain arcs in their relationship either drag or come too quickly. It feels a little like a 80-90 minute play cut down to fit Fringe, which may well be the case. The current iteration’s pacing can thus be somewhat jarring at times, particularly in moments of emotional climax which often spring up suddenly.

Nevertheless, the overarching feeling one leaves with is of immersion; passion for this relationship, the tragedies within, and the art that it produced. The tragic finality of an artist finding themselves unable to draw any other face but the one that caught their heart is tangible and powerful; the creeping eyes, the nose, everything. She stays with him. And La Bella stays with you.


LA BELLA at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe – C ARTS

Reviewed on 19th August 2024

by Horatio Holloway

 

 


LA BELLA

LA BELLA

CLICK HERE TO SEE ALL OUR REVIEWS FROM EDINBURGH 2024