Tag Archives: Joe Underwood

Dirty Corset

Dirty Corset

★★½

Pleasance Theatre

Dirty Corset

Dirty Corset

Pleasance Theatre

Reviewed – 19th April 2022

★★½

 

“an exercise in acting of the kind that feels like one long improvisation”

 

Dirty Corset, produced as part of the 2022 New Work Season at the Pleasance Theatre in Islington, is one of several shows on offer in a venue that has not only survived the pandemic, but seems to be thriving. That’s good news in these difficult times. Dirty Corset, directed by Helen Tennison for the Bang Average Theatre Company, seems like a good choice for this venue, as it is also about making a living in the theatre in difficult times. Dirty Corset is a “re-imagined” take on Restoration Comedy. But this show focuses on the fleas, and not the elegance, of post Civil War theatre. Modern, and even postmodern, playwrights have taken on this trope before. The Bang Average Theatre Company pushes it into new territory. Bad smells, and bad language, are the predominant themes.

To be fair, the actors do warn that Dirty Corset is loaded, if that is the right word, from the outset. The first thing the audience sees, in entering the space downstairs at the Pleasance, are the corsets themselves. These, and the other costume pieces hung from lines draped around the set, are clean, even blindingly white, clean. But no one should relax. It’s all an ironic set up for the grubbiness that follows. The seventy minute show excels in presenting the audience with incongruities throughout. Actors Laurie Coldwell, Chloe Darke and Susannah Scott go from minutes of lying inert on large, white cushioned squares while the audience files in, to exploding into action once the lights go down. The acting style is eye poppingly physical. Raw eggs are featured, and do not have a happy ending.

Is Dirty Corset Restoration Comedy, re-imagined? Audiences will find it a matter of personal taste — still a new idea in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Dirty Corset tells the disjointed, and rather hard to follow, tale of a group of itinerant, flea ridden actors trying their luck in the indifferent North. Aptly named Mary Moralless, Isabinda McLovealot and Neil Hasbeen, Coldwell, Darke and Scott switch between playing their roles on stage, playing the actors off it, and sometimes their modern selves, with bewildering speed. This doesn’t give the audience a lot of time to identify with any of these switcheroos, or even care. Bang Average have done some research, and some of the details of the seventeenth century actors’ lives are undoubtably accurate. But for the most part, Dirty Corset chooses to ignore the fact that Restoration Comedy was an elegant style of theatre — a new theatre for its times, of Reason and Wit, despite its bawdiness.

Ultimately, Dirty Corset is an exercise in acting of the kind that feels like one long improvisation. The Company acknowledges as much in their programme notes. As such, it works quite well. It shows off the actors’ athleticism and versatility to great effect. But the script is deconstructed (much like the costumes) in a way that doesn’t leave much room to focus on anything else but the acting. Dirty Corset is the kind of show that will appeal to festivals, and it is a great showcase for energetic young actors. But for audiences who like a good script as well as good acting and solid production values — this offering by Bang Average is all about the underwear, and may feel a little underdressed.

 

 

Reviewed by Dominica Plummer

Photography by Hannah Sorrell

 


Dirty Corset

Pleasance Theatre until 24th April

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:
Catching Comets | ★★★★ | September 2021
Dog Show | ★★★★★ | December 2021
Express G&S | ★★★★ | June 2021
Ginger Johnson & Pals | ★★★★ | June 2021
Godot is a Woman | ★★★½ | June 2021
Lights Out | ★★★★ | October 2021
She Seeks Out Wool | ★★★★ | January 2022

 

Click here to see our most recent reviews

 

Us

Us

★★★★

White Bear Theatre

Us

Us

White Bear Theatre

Reviewed – 9th February 2022

★★★★

 

“With two fine performances and brisk direction from David Frias-Robles”

 

Like the piece itself, the title of David Persiva’s debut play is short yet deceptively clever. “Us” doesn’t just refer to the two unnamed characters on the stage, but also us in the audience. It is almost discomforting at times to realise how recognisable the dialogue is. We are the ones who are watching them, but it feels like Persiva has been the fly on our walls all along, collecting words, thoughts and emotions to create his jagged little two-hander.

It begins at the end and ends at the beginning, and in between it ricochets between the two. The flickering lampshades steer us from the past to present and back, each alternating scene seamlessly following on from the last yet existing years apart, literally and emotionally. A phrase repeated in a different time and context takes on a whole new meaning and it is a device Persiva uses to great effect.

The focus of the piece seems to fall on failed expectations. But this show digs wider and deeper as the two unnamed characters attract and repel in equal measure. Naoimh Morgan is ‘Her’ while Persiva plays ‘Him’; both adopting a naturalism and authenticity that almost feels improvised. Or to be fair, it’s simply true to life. Persiva appears to bear more of the highs and lows of this switchback ride while Morgan’s relative pragmatism controls the speed of the ride. She accuses him of forever falling into situations without enough proactivity, yet she repeatedly justifies her past misdemeanours by explaining that it was ‘just easier’.

The empathy we feel is aided by the detail of Maeve Reading’s set. Although we only see the living room, we can visualise what’s in the fridge, and we know who’s left the top of the toothpaste off in the bathroom. Which is what this is all about; the domesticity that shields the underlying issues is what “Us” is unpeeling. It’s never about the toothpaste really, so c’mon… what are you really saying? Despite the play’s honesty and insight, we do feel that we want to dig deeper. ‘His’ character certainly has more dimensions, with hints of mental health, that are begging to be explored further. This outing does sometimes have the feel of an early draft – which in itself is exciting as it gives the impression that we are witnessing a showcase of a longer, full length production to come.

“If you could start again knowing everything you know about me now, would you?”This is a dilemma which in real life probably rarely elicits an honest answer. Whether the characters in “Us” demonstrate more truthfulness is open to question, but Persiva’s writing has enough insight for us to re-examine ourselves. Like the title, the play is short yet deceptively clever. In sixty minutes, it explores the last half hour and the first half hour of a relationship, painting a vivid picture of the years between. With two fine performances and brisk direction from David Frias-Robles, this is a refreshing return to fringe theatre as it should be. Intimate, absorbing and up close. Away from the spotlight on how the next big new musical is coping post-pandemic, the White Bear – and other such theatres – have struggled too. And thankfully survived. Plays like “Us” will ensure that survival continues.

 

 

Reviewed by Jonathan Evans

Photography Antony Popov & Teva McNeill

 


Us

White Bear Theatre until 19th February

 

Recently reviewed at this venue:
Luck be a Lady | ★★★ | June 2021
Marlowe’s Fate | ★★★ | November 2021

 

Click here to see our most recent reviews