Tag Archives: Julia Stubbs

EDWARD’S TALK: WHAT’S DRIVING YOU?

β˜…β˜…β˜…

Edinburgh Festival Fringe

EDWARD’S TALK: WHAT’S DRIVING YOU? at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe

β˜…β˜…β˜…

“less successful when assessed as a piece of theatre, than it was as an informative and engaging lesson”

Edward delivers speed awareness sessions, the type you can opt into to avoid points for speeding, or according to Edward’s experience, be mandated to attend by the police. As audience members, we are told we are in the latter category and encouraged to admit our own driving errors – driving with a hangover, when angry, or when in a rush.

Edward is an old hand at these talks, but today he has forgotten his PowerPoint and is flustered, warm, anxious and thirsty. He is dedicated to sharing his encyclopaediac knowledge of the cause and effects of road traffic β€˜incidents’, because there are no accidents, only avoidable mistakes ending in one form of tragedy or another. Sharing facts and figures, he insists (politely and reassuringly) in audience engagement to check our understanding of the hard science of collisions with real life examples, such as the distance a pedestrian can be thrown when hit by a car at a mere 30mph.

In this new, devised one-hander, written by A G Anderson, the amiable Edward , β€˜never Ted’ played by Andrew Bruce-Lockhart is an eminently likeable, if very softly spoken, slightly bumbling presenter of his talk, flitting from real life engagement with the audience to more emotional flashbacks of dialogue with people in his life who have been affected by his driving and choices. He keeps forgetting things, or cannot find what he needs, perhaps a symbol for the importance of the deliberate consciousness with which he urges us, repeatedly, to remember: β€˜Drive like it matters.’

The staging is minimal, which suits the lecture style setting– a flipboard which does not sit quite straight, a chair and nothing else, but we follow the mood and flashbacks easily with Director Julia Stubb’s lighting changes, as past experiences literally cause Edward to pause and sometimes to recoil at his actions and consequences. There are some effective but not intrusive soundscapes of pulsating rhythms, introduced to highlight the building historic tensions in Edward’s life. The final message brings home our inherent human flaws. These cannot be avoided, but we can reduce the risks when we get behind the wheel of a car by driving more consciously.

This is not primarily a dark show, it is a powerful message which Edward – and the organisations working to promote road safety awareness in the UK – are urgently trying to promote to a new audience by showing it at Edinburgh Fringe and other venues.

β€˜Edward’s Talk’ was less successful when assessed as a piece of theatre, than it was as an informative and engaging lesson. Nevertheless, the work is extending this important message to a wide cross section of a new audience and as such, it is an interesting and original piece of work.

As Edward says, β€˜We are all fragile humans, a mixture of β€˜flesh, skin and hope’ and we need to heed the message β€˜Drive like you mean it.’


EDWARD’S TALK: WHAT’S DRIVING YOU? at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe – theSpace @ Surgeons’ Hall – Theatre 1

Reviewed on 13th August 2024

by Lucy Williams

 

 


EDWARD’S TALK

EDWARD’S TALK

CLICK HERE TO SEE ALL OUR REVIEWS FROM EDINBURGH 2024

 

What I Really Think of my Husband

β˜…β˜…β˜…

Golden Goose Theatre

WHAT I REALLY THINK OF MY HUSBAND at the Golden Goose Theatre

β˜…β˜…β˜…

“The play has the air of a work in progress, but the five strong cast give it substantial shape”

Despite his literary success as a novelist and a poet, Thomas Hardy was quite a shy personality who tried to keep a precarious control over what aspects of his life were to be divulged and what were not. Although his two marriages have gained public attention, not much is really known beyond the facts. Following Emma’s death (his first wife) he burnt a manuscript of hers entitled β€˜What I Think of My Husband’, together with most of her diaries. When Hardy’s second wife, Florence, decided to write a β€˜biography’ of him, he retained control by dictating to her virtually the whole of the manuscript.

Writer David Pinner (whose novel β€˜Ritual’ inspired the cult film β€˜The Wicker Man’) delves deeper with a new play β€œWhat I Really Think of My Husband”. Its premiere, at the intimate Golden Goose Theatre, comes without fanfare or frills. The play has the air of a work in progress, but the five strong cast give it substantial shape in Julia Stubbs’ slick and engaging presentation.

When we first meet Thomas Hardy (Edmund Dehn) he has recently published β€˜Jude the Obscure’ which received a harsh reception from scandalised critics, and which his first wife, Emma (Laura Fitzpatrick), perceived as being based on their own marriage. Dehn and Fitzpatrick spar like Edward Albee’s George and Martha, surrounded by their imaginary menagerie of cats. The cats have filled the gaps in their childless marriage while the bickering has displaced the romance. Intercut are scenes of the couple in their youth (Andrew Crouch and Aliya Silverstone) as yet unaware of the ephemeral nature of infatuation. When his wife dies, Hardy marries his secretary Florence Dugdale (Isabella Inchbald) who sadly could never really escape the shadow of the first wife. Her aspirations of being the true muse were thwarted by Hardy’s love poetry forever being inspired with Emma in mind.

Pinner’s script has a lyrical flow, referencing Hardy’s poetry such as β€˜The Dawn after the Dance’ and β€˜The Dead Man Walking’ and lesser-known works as well. There is a Gothic touch, with traces of dark humour. But although he treats the material with care and a poetic sensitivity, the result is a little confusing. Not so much due to the chronological shifts in the narrative, more because of an over emphasis on an extra character, also called Florence, and also played by Inchbald. The first half of the piece is slightly dragged down by the story of Florence Henniker, a poet and novelist who collaborated with Hardy. Inchbald comes into her own as Florence Dugdale in the second act. As Hardy’s secretary she manages to shield herself from Emma’s prophetic warnings. But later, as Hardy’s wife, she has little armour against the ghostly challenges from beyond the grave.

Dehn gives an inspired performance as Hardy, striking the right note of being somewhat unaware of his own excruciating behaviour. Fitzpatrick skilfully avoids throwing Emma into the role of victim and instead elevates the character into lead role material. After all, it is supposed to be her story. Yet it is also billed as a β€˜ghost story’ in its marketing, yet this much anticipated through-line doesn’t fully materialise. We want more of the supernatural to manifest itself rather than hover in the twilight zone of the play; and it feels like Pinner has missed a trick here.

They say that β€˜behind every great man there is a great woman’. With Thomas Hardy there were two. At least. And a ghost thrown in for good measure. Pinner sheds light on these characters, but it is Stubbs’ production – and the performances – that really bring them to life.

 

WHAT I REALLY THINK OF MY HUSBAND at the Golden Goose Theatre

Reviewed on 24th November 2023

by Jonathan Evans

 


 
 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

Strangers In Between | β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… | September 2023

What I Really Think of my Husband

What I Really Think of my Husband

Click here to see our Recommended Shows page