MANHUNT
Royal Court
β β β β
βSamuel Edward-Cookβs performance is a tour-de-forceβ
Behind a metallic, gauze curtain a figure paces back and forth. Shaven headed. His shadow follows him across the vertical wall of the translucent screen β a projected alter ego pursuing its prey, fuelling the claustrophobic motions of the manβs repetitive circuit. His behaviour is erratic yet painfully routine. Itβs like watching a captive animal through the bars of a zooβs enclosure.
A flash of brilliant white light releases him to tell his story. Itβs a story that dominated the front pages and caught the public imagination during the summer of 2010. That of the major police operation across Tyne and Wear β the manhunt for fugitive Raoul Moat. The ex-prisoner was on the run for nearly a week after a killing spree, ending with a six-hour standoff with armed police and Moatβs suicide. It was a story that landed in the lap of journalist Andrew Hankinson whose subsequent book inspired Robert Ickeβs brutal and challenging one-act play. The overriding word on our lips is βwhy?β
βManhuntβ doesnβt offer any answers, but it poses the question from every angle, looking at the horrific events through the eyes of the victims and the perpetrator, often begging us to ask which is which. Ickeβs writing and direction steer the narrative in a cyclical fashion, swinging between flashbacks and the present. It is often Kafkaesque in its approach as Moat fights a system he believes has been against him since birth. Whether we are supposed to be or not, we are drawn into Moatβs own tragedy as much as his victimβs which is unsettling to say the least. Samuel Edward-Cookβs performance is a tour-de-force that reinforces this with a warped honesty as he tries to justify himself. All the while he is surrounded by figures from his past and present: the judges and juries that accuse him of hitting his daughter; the ex-partner; his childhood self, locked in his room by his unstable mother; the father he never knew; social workers; friends, accomplices and detractors, and most importantly his victims. A poignant extended blackout heightens a first-hand account from a police officer he randomly shot and blinded in a cold-hearted act of revenge.
The supporting cast who play the multiple roles are as equally compelling as Edward-Cook, if not as frightening. This could well have been a one man show along the lines of the recent βKenrexβ, which follows similar themes, but the ensemble here fleshes out the account and adds a distinct and welcome light and shade. There is occasional confusion during moments when we are unsure that what we are witnessing is in Moatβs mind or in reality. Hallucinations overlap real life too often, yet it all adds to the unease, and we are constantly left unsure who to believe. So rather than collude with anybody we end up trusting no one. An unsatisfactory and dangerous position to be in, but one that maybe Icke is trying to spotlight.
Danger is an undercurrent that bursts to the surface constantly. Edward-Cookβs manic, wild-eyed stare cements this. He is a drowning man watching his life flash before him. Azusa Onoβs lighting evokes the episodes with haunting atmosphere, from the coldness of a prison cell to the campfire warmth of his last hiding place in the Northumbrian countryside. Here Moat talks to fellow Geordie, Paul Gascoigne before confronting his estranged father and being consoled by a doting grandmother. It is all unreal, but it helps him unearth the truth of his nature. There is only one conclusion. Justice takes a back seat while cause and effect β action and reaction β take centre stage.
At the time, Moat was famously labelled a βcallous murdererβ¦ end of storyβ. Which is arguably the case. This play appears to challenge that assumption, but Ickeβs writing is as ambiguous as the history as he tries to dig deeper. But there is no avoiding the fact that Moat was a big, strong man who used violence against those who were weaker than him. He lied, he lacked control, and he tried to justify his actions that ruined and ended lives. It is not a good story. However, Icke turns it into a breath-taking piece of theatre. We might wonder why he chose to do so, but we are enthralled and disturbed by the experience, and the performances will stick in our minds for quite a while. A gripping production. End of story.
MANHUNT
Royal Court
Reviewed on 8th April 2025
by Jonathan Evans
Photography by Manuel Harlan