Tag Archives: Theatre N16

Timeless – 3 Stars

Timeless

Timeless

Theatre N16

Reviewed – 1st October 2018

β˜…β˜…β˜…

“informative and thoughtful, but not emotionally resonant”

 

β€œYou have a problem” reads a message in Martin’s phone in Timeless. It goes on to describe how he suffers from anterograde amnesia – a condition preventing him from creating new short-term memories and rendering him unable to remember anything past April 2008. This is the central idea of Brian Coyle’s one-man play; however, it never feels like it’s expanded on meaningfully throughout its one-hour runtime.

Martin largely addresses the audience about how his life works with the condition and how his family and friends – specifically his wife Tracey and his friend Neil – cope with the day to day strains of a man for whom the last ten years are a blank, although there are also brief flashbacks interspersed. There is an underlying story that develops, centred around Martin and Tracey’s relationship, but it is so clearly foreshadowed within the first twenty minutes that it becomes repetitive to see it play out exactly as expected. However, Timeless mostly forgoes a standard plot in favour of ruminations on memory, and how if the way an event is remembered or misremembered defines someone’s actions, then Martin not being able to remember anything possibly leaves him without a real sense of identity. This is where the script shines the most, as some psychologically complex ideas are delivered in an accessible and charming way.

John Rayment delivers an excellent performance as Martin, frequently elevating the material and providing an endearing earnestness to the character. It’s a testament to Rayment’s talent that, practically on his own except for a few props in the minimalistic set, he keeps the audience consistently enamoured. However, this is occasionally discordant with what we learn about Martin as the play develops, and it would’ve been a more layered performance had Rayment and director Charlotte Peters found moments to coax out the less earnest sides of the character. Additionally, there were a number of moments where Martin perpetuates outdated gender roles such as by demanding his wife make him a cup of tea, which felt unnecessary when not utilised to make a point about these issues.

And within that lies the main structural issue of Timeless – it was difficult to understand why this story was being told. Anterograde amnesia isn’t a common condition, and the play seemed unwilling to place it in the wider context of a more relatable issue, which subsequently made it informative and thoughtful, but not emotionally resonant. With further drafts from Brian Coyle that are able to let the audience empathise more, and with perhaps additional actors that let us see Martin’s relationships play out dynamically, Timeless has a lot of potential that currently feels hazy and distant.

 

Reviewed by Tom Francis

Photography courtesyΒ Mixed Up TheatreΒ 

 


Timeless

Theatre N16 until 4th October

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:
Unicorn | β˜…β˜…β˜…Β½ | May 2018
Shakespeare’s Mad Women | β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… | June 2018
Reading Gaol | β˜…β˜…β˜…Β½ | July 2018
Castles Palaces Castles | β˜…β˜… | September 2018
Rough | β˜…β˜… | September 2018

 

Click here to see more of our latest reviews on thespyinthestalls.com

 

 

Castles Palaces Castles – 2 Stars

Castles

Castles Palaces Castles

Theatre N16

Reviewed – 30th September 2018

β˜…β˜…

“some really strong components involved in this piece, but their combined effect is unfortunately unimpactful”

 

A panel of three people sit, getting ready, adjusting their laptops. An armchair is draped in white. Two more performers join onstage, bringing on and rearranging other pieces of furniture, all wrapped in white material. This is accompanied by a silence punctuated only by the sound of the panelists testing their microphones, until a gradual soundscape is built, and the text begins. This is a multi-disciplinary piece, that combines experimental theatre and spoken word, aided by the use of soundscape and projection.

According to the programme, the show is inspired by the story of a French postman who, in 1879, began to build a palace that he had seen in his dreams. The build took him 33 years. It is a fascinating concept but unfortunately the show is too abstract and unengaging to do it any justice. The person behind this narrative is not explored and the many wonderful possibilities are not drawn out.

Calum Lynn’s text is beautifully written, but this again is done a disservice, accompanied by the action onstage. The text is beautifully and articulately delivered, but is predominantly pitched at one level, which requires a lot of focus not to wander from. The constant furniture moving feels amateurish and unsophisticated, overly repetitive and uninspired. The actions chosen feel ingenuine and are difficult to relate to and be moved by.

At certain points, projections morph over the white furniture. As a concept this works really well and has a really strong visual effect, but the projection design is not sufficiently cohesive, and so isn’t always used to its full effect. The soundscape element, created live before us, is a really exciting part of this piece and works really well, underscoring the words.

There are some really strong components involved in this piece, but their combined effect is unfortunately unimpactful.

 

Reviewed by Amelia Brown

Photography courtesy Significant Other TheatreΒ 

 


Castles Palaces Castles

Theatre N16 until 4th October

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:
Unicorn | β˜…β˜…β˜…Β½ | May 2018
Shakespeare’s Mad Women | β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… | June 2018
Reading Gaol | β˜…β˜…β˜…Β½ | July 2018
Rough | β˜…β˜… | September 2018

 

Click here to see more of our latest reviews on thespyinthestalls.com