Category Archives: Reviews

COMPOSITOR E

Compositor E

★★★

Omnibus Theatre

COMPOSITOR E at the Omnibus Theatre

★★★

COMPOSITOR E

“It’s a fascinating concept – well researched and historically accurate”

Who owns our stories? And how is meaning imbued in them? Marking 400 years since the printing of Shakespeare’s first folio, Compositor E, an original story and script by Charlie Dupré, explores the collective endeavour of its publication. We get beyond Shakespeare as singular genius and instead learn, directly and indirectly, about the role of King James I in the development of Macbeth, the printer Isaac Jaggard and compositors Richard and John who arrange the type for the first folio.

It’s a fascinating concept – well researched and historically accurate. There was a real 17-year-old John Leason who started an apprenticeship with Jaggard in 1622. Scholars have dubbed him compositor e, ranked fifth compared to the other compositors due to his inaccuracy and difficulties dealing with the manuscript copy. The play opens in the midst of the printing process in Jaggard’s printing house when John Leason arrives for his first day. It’s farcical seeing Leason thrown in at the deep end by a stretched and stressed Jaggard whilst Richard Bardolph, another compositor, winds him up. Leason is a fast learner and soon gets promoted to deciphering the manuscripts into type when Richard falls ill. But Jaggard’s advice that the compositor leaves a mark goes to John’s head, and he’s left thinking about making changes to correct, in his view, the wrongs that have been done to the women in the story, drawing on the wrongs that were done to his own mother.

The piece includes high calibre performances from the three main cast members. Tré Medley as John Leason plays both the naivete and dark underlying trauma with concentrated intensity. David Monteith as Richard Bardolph brings light relief, with his evenly-paced, booming voice and physical humour; pissing into a chamber pot and spewing up on stage. Kaffe Keating, for me, is the standout of the cast, playing the busy head of the family company trying to make a name for himself in his father’s absence with maturity and depth.

“Set and costume design are beautifully interpreted”

Medley has possibly the most challenging role of the three due to his character’s flighty and inconsistent nature. He goes from inexperienced apprentice, to plotting against his boss, to then packing up to leave in unbelievably quick succession, although Medley handles these well. What can’t be made up for is a lack of exposition in terms of his motivation. It’s clear early on that something around the circumstances of his mother’s death is haunting Leason, but it’s not until the final scenes of the piece that we start to unpick what happened, and why that drives his fixation on whether the women of Macbeth are wayward or weyard. Given so much of the tension of the piece derives from this – the audience needs to know, sooner, what’s going on.

Three female cast members use stylised movement to operate the printing press and mix the ink, evoking the three witches, or wayward sisters, of Macbeth. Given the plays strong critique of the treatment of women in witch hunts under James I’s reign – it would have been appropriate for there to be more speaking female characters, rather than them being an addendum to the main action.

Set and costume design (Sophia Pardon) are beautifully interpreted. All action takes place in the workshop and so the stage is covered with ink stains on the floor, across clothes and up the papyrus-coloured walls. Words spelt out by Leason are projected onto printed sheets suspended across the stage. The closing monologue is also supported by an intricate video projection (Rachel Sampley) that adds, alongside the musical crescendo (Adam McCready), to the sense of an earth-shaking moment with the publication of the first folio.

Compositor E has an original and inspired concept, brought to life by its talented cast and creatives. More internal consistency and earlier explanation of its main character’s motives would elevate this to greater heights.


COMPOSITOR E at the Omnibus Theatre

Reviewed on 22nd September 2023

by Amber Woodward

Photography by Dan Tsantillis


 

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

FLIGHTS  ★★★½  February 2020

THE GLASS WILL SHATTER ★★  January 2020

THE LITTLE PRINCE ★★  December 2019

FIJI  ★★★★★  November 2019

Compositor E

Compositor E

Click here to read all our latest reviews

 

Strangers in Between

Strangers in Between

★★★★

Golden Goose Theatre

STRANGERS IN BETWEEN at the Golden Goose Theatre

★★★★

Strangers in Between

“Murphy has an ear for brilliant one liners and non-sequiturs, and a piercing insight into human contradictions.”

“Strangers In Between” premiered in Sydney, Australia in 2005. Not that long ago in the great scheme of things, but it has already acquired the sheen of a period piece. To describe it as a ‘classic’ might be going a bit too far, yet it might only be a matter of time such is the astute personal observation and grasp of characterisation. Primarily a coming-of-age play that explores the highs and lows of growing up gay in twenty-first century Australia, Tommy Murphy’s three-hander extends beyond demographics and speaks to ‘everyman’. There is a refreshing inclusivity in the writing that, stemming from the heart of the piece, reaches out and embraces the universal themes of friendship, fear, family and other ‘f’ words.

Shane (Alex Ansdell) is young, ingenuous, desperately naïve and, well, simply desperate. He has washed up in Kings Cross Sydney, having run away from his hometown deep in the Southern Tablelands of New South Wales. Nervous and paranoid, he has not managed to escape the shadows of violence and abuse from which he appears to be fleeing. Working in a bottle shop, he strikes up a friendship with two contrasting men: the self-assured, cool-headed Will (Matthew Mitcham) and the more mature, witty and camp Peter (Stephen Connery-Brown). Shane has no filters but, despite stretching the patience of the other two, he becomes adopted into a new-found, surrogate family that he evidently hasn’t had the comfort of before now.

There are twists, of course. One in particular that you don’t see coming, even sitting up close in the intimate space of the Golden Goose theatre. Like everything else in the piece, it is not over-egged. It all works on a subliminal level, the gentleness being a smoke screen for the realistically harsh issues bubbling underneath. Murphy has an ear for brilliant one liners and non-sequiturs, and a piercing insight into human contradictions. Adam Spreadbury-Maher returns to direct, having steered it successfully from the King’s Head into the West End in 2016 and 2017. His staging is a pitch-perfect complement (and compliment) to the writing, along with Richard Lambert’s lighting that mirrors the light and shade of the text, enhancing the mood and sense of location.

“A real and rare find that must be seen”

Moreover, the performances are what bring the play fully to life. Spreadbury-Maher has brought together a formidable trio of actors whose chemistry creates an electrifying ménage à trois. For a professional debut, Alex Ansdell excels as the hyper Shane; jittery, paranoid and certainly damaged. Switching from the inane to the explicit, the fawning to the abusive, Ansdell has a command of the text that belies his experience. (Who else could string together the subject of coat hangers and anal sex so naturally into the same sentence?). Matthew Mitcham, as Will, flawlessly depicts the emotions triggered by this infuriating yet loveable new-boy-in-town, wavering between attraction and repulsion, ultimately slipping into the mantle of brotherly love. Mitcham also doubles up as Ben, the abusive brother from whom Shane is supposedly escaping, but I shall say no more about this dramatic conceit for fear of spoilers.

Stephen Connery-Brown, as Peter the older man, reacts to Shane with a heartfelt, honest and humorous affection. A quiet and quite brilliant portrayal of a character who defies stereotype. There is a lustful twinkle in his eye as he takes Shane under his wing, without a sense of being predatory. Teasing with tenderness he gives an air of being able to take or leave Shane but we sense a paternal longing. It is testament to the writing and performances that these personalities can mix this yearning for surrogate family ties with sexual desire, and yet avoid any hint of seediness.

“Strangers In between” is above all a character led piece; the beauty of it lying in the fact it tackles the issues without having to hold up placards. Another sense in which it can be described as a period piece – it revisits a style of theatre that is becoming increasingly rare. The skill is innate, and the audience is allowed to soak up the experience of their own free will with no pointers, extravagant trickery or didacticism. It is an honest, rite-of-passage story, perhaps a little too gentle in its conclusion, but wickedly funny and acute in its observations. A real and rare find that must be seen.

 


STRANGERS IN BETWEEN at the Golden Goose Theatre

Reviewed on 22nd September 2023

by Jonathan Evans

Photography by Peter Davies

 

 

 

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

LIVING WITH THE LIGHTS ON  ★★★★  October 2020

HOWERD’S END  ★★★½  October 2020

Strangers in Between

Strangers in Between

Click here to read all our latest reviews