Tag Archives: Alex Brenner

PIGS FLY EASY RYAN

★★★½

Edinburgh Festival Fringe

PIGS FLY EASY RYAN

Edinburgh Festival Fringe

★★★½

“you can’t deny having an absolutely wild time watching the chaos unfold”

A technical hiccup with a set malfunction early on had me genuinely wondering whether it was part of the show… that is very much the territory we’re in here! NONSTOP’s Pigs Fly Easy Ryan, one of the three winners of this year’s prestigious Untapped Award, is messy, chaotic, and unashamedly absurd. Two plane crash fetishists pose as flight attendants to sneak aboard a flight, in a show that’s part physical clowning, part stream-of-consciousness monologue, part performance art fever dream.

There are moments where the chaos really works. As we enter the space, we’re greeted by two very overly-enthusiastic flight attendants, with sunburnt-red faces. What happens next is hard to describe. The two performers (Lou Doyle and Trevor White) crawl around on the floor or at other times leap on each other like overgrown kids in the playground. There are references in the dialogue to consumerism, capitalism and the climate crisis, with specific mentions of Jeff Bezos and Amazon. I can imagine it being a really compelling pitch as part of the Untapped process, if nothing else for its downright absurdity.

But the anarchy isn’t always consistent. Some moments feel undercooked, with one particularly important speech getting lost under music that is just too loud. The humour, too, can be hit-and-miss. When it works, it’s genuinely very funny; when it doesn’t, it feels like watching a work in progress performance still finding its shape.

As the absurdity continues, the audience are genuinely baffled by what we’re all watching. We all get involved as the performers hand out pieces of cloud-like material and ask us to throw it in the air. A little later in the show, they strip down to their underwear and throw themselves down an inflatable slide on repeat. A video montage of various references to pigs in pop culture appears on the backdrop. It feels like it’s trying to tie a bunch of stuff together, but doesn’t fully manage it.

By the end, a couple of final lines stick: “Should we be flying right now?” and “We’ve been dying for a holiday. A break. A breath.” There’s a sharp idea here: weighing our desperation for escape in a modern world full of burnout and overworking against the urgent need for climate responsibility and a wider urgency to be taking action. But the show never quite commits fully to this idea. It feels like it wants to use the unhinged to explore these important points, but it only ever feels half-realised. Still, you can’t deny having an absolutely wild time watching the chaos unfold.

 



PIGS FLY EASY RYAN

Edinburgh Festival Fringe

Reviewed on 9th August 2025 at Iron Belly at Underbelly, Cowgate

by Joseph Dunitz

Photography by Alex Brenner

 

 

 

 

 

PIGS FLY EASY RYAN

PIGS FLY EASY RYAN

PIGS FLY EASY RYAN

AFTER THE ACT

★★

Royal Court

AFTER THE ACT

Royal Court

★★

“it remains an interesting and worthwhile history lesson”

Jenny lives with Eric and Martin was just another children’s book in 1988. It wasn’t new and wasn’t even originally British, as it had first been published in Copenhagen in 1982. So how did this book become the starting point of a campaign, which ultimately led to the inclusion of Section 28 within the Local Government Act of 1988? After the Act is an entertaining musical, which tells the story of Section 28 through the eyes of those most closely affected.

‘Section 28’ refers to a specific clause with the Local Government Act of 1988, which prohibited schools from ‘promoting’ homosexuality, the wording of which was ambiguous enough that it resulted in the restriction of teaching of the acceptability of homosexuality, particularly concerning family relationships.

It is a strange era to look back on. Views that would be considered to be politically extreme nowadays were front and centre and were actually winning the argument. An imaginary enemy had been conjured up, largely driven by ignorance and misunderstanding. After the Act explores this period of recent history from multiple vital perspectives: teachers who could not speak up for risk of jeopardising their careers, students for whom bullying and discrimination had become a part of their everyday existence and the activists who fought hard to educate people and bring about real change.

The play splits fairly evenly into two halves. In the first act, we see the build-up to the passing of the Act in 1988. The tone is set clearly early in the play. People’s concerns about gay people are not challenged, whereas protestors are dismissed as mad rabble-rousers. Two scenes stand out in the first act. The first is where protestors have made it on the news at 6 on the BBC but are being silenced (fitting for the time) to not disrupt the broadcast. The second is the re-enactment of protestors abseiling into the House of Lords following the passing of the bill. These scenes are excellently written (Billy Barrett and Ellice Stevens) paying tribute to the real-life activists involved.

The second act covers the aftermath to the passing of the Act before it was eventually repealed in 2003, detailing the experiences of people who had to live through this time period and how it affected them well beyond the law had been changed. This should be the point where it all comes together. However, the biggest issue is the contradiction between its comedic elements and the hard-hitting truths that it wishes to divulge. The tone of most of the first act is strangely uplifting and funny, which is maintained through to the start of the second act, when one of the performers enters the stage dressed as Margaret Thatcher and sings as the former Prime Minister.

The individual elements of the play are interesting and well-performed, and all of the cast display an impressive range as they move from character to character bringing to life more people’s stories from this period. However, these parts often work against each other without a clear link to the central narrative, rather appearing more like a slide show of different characters.

Keyboard and drums add a lively accompaniment to the performances on stage. Sadly, the backing music and use of songs is often overdone and is too much of an ‘ever-present’ during the show rather peaking for significant moments, which does make it a little tiring, giving the show an impression of ‘more bark than bite’. Overall, despite its flaws as a production, it remains an interesting and worthwhile history lesson, which deserves to be taught.



AFTER THE ACT

Royal Court

Reviewed on 27th May 2025

by Luke Goscomb

Photography by Alex Brenner

 

 


 

 

 

 

Last ten shows reviewed at this venue:

MANHUNT | ★★★★ | April 2025
A GOOD HOUSE | ★★★★ | January 2025
THE BOUNDS | ★★★ | June 2024
LIE LOW | ★★★★ | May 2024
BLUETS | ★★★ | May 2024
GUNTER | ★★★★ | April 2024
COWBOIS | ★★★★★ | January 2024
MATES IN CHELSEA | ★★★ | November 2023
CUCKOO | ★★½ | July 2023
BLACK SUPERHERO | ★★★★ | March 2023

 

 

AFTER THE ACT

AFTER THE ACT

AFTER THE ACT