Tag Archives: Gate Theatre

Why the Child is Cooking in the Polenta
★★

Gate Theatre

Why the Child is Cooking in the Polenta

Why the Child is Cooking in the Polenta

Gate Theatre

Reviewed – 1st May 2019

★★

 

“A promising beginning introduces the idea of shadow puppetry that is sadly abandoned as quickly as it comes”

 

Based on the Romanian novel ‘Why the Child Is Cooking In The Polenta’ by Aglaja Veteranyi, this tantalisingly titled one-person show has an intriguing story of migration and cultural difference hidden somewhere within it, but writer, actor and producer Edith Alibec doesn’t quite manage to unveil it fully to the audience, leaving them instead with a laborious and slightly tedious hour-or-so of theatre.

Witnessed through the eyes of a child, a nomadic Romanian family leaves their circus tents and trailers behind for a life in Germany. With a mother who “hangs by her hair” and a violent father, our narrator finds refuge in wild flights of imaginative fancy. Fleeing the Communist regime in Romania, the little girl/narrator struggles learning German in the classroom but is resolute to show her teachers she is more than just a teary-eyed foreigner. It’s only through being so far from home however, that the girl truly understands what ‘home’ means.

Vincent Kling has produced a flowing and magically realistic English translation of Alibec’s script that doesn’t shy away from using Romanian and German words and phrases to good effect. Romanian speakers in the audience certainly had the last laugh, finding comedy in cultural references that flew a little over my English-and-German-speaking head. Alibec is also not a bad performer, a container of boundless energy and childlike exuberance who convinces as much as a modest adult as she does an emotional and ecstatic child. Dana Paraschiv’s direction leaves the stage almost empty aside from certain food-based props, clothes and a handy footstool whose purpose constantly changes. A promising beginning introduces the idea of shadow puppetry that is sadly abandoned as quickly as it comes.

Being such a short show, alarm bells ring when audience members begin to leave way before it’s done. Alibec is a charismatic performer but fails to create a meaningful or empathetic main character. The storytelling is woefully unclear, allowing childlike rambling to supersede much-needed narration. This would work wonderfully if the childhood memories were engaging or entertaining in their own right – but they simply aren’t.

Despite its credible performance, ‘Why the Child…’ presents a vague and (frankly) quite boring narrative that fails to grapple satisfactorily with some compelling questions about nationality and cultural heritage. I’d advise staying home and eating polenta instead.

 

Reviewed by Joseph Prestwich

Photography by Ayse Yavas

 


Why the Child is Cooking in the Polenta

Gate Theatre until 4th May

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:
Dear Elizabeth | ★★ | January 2019

 

Click here to see more of our latest reviews on thespyinthestalls.com

 

Dear Elizabeth

Dear Elizabeth
★★

Gate Theatre

Dear Elizabeth

Dear Elizabeth

Gate Theatre

Reviewed – 23rd January 2019

★★

 

“the cold reading approach precludes us form caring about the characters and is an unfortunate roadblock before we even start on their journey”

 

The playwright Sarah Ruhl came across the lives of American poets, Elizabeth Bishop and Robert Lowell, reading a book of letters between them. She found there was “something deeply compelling about the way these two lives intersected”. The letters, which span three decades from 1947 to 1977, tell the story of their relationship that defies easy definition. It wasn’t quite a friendship, nor a love affair: they seldom met, and both lived independent lives: Bishop was a lesbian and Lowell was with a variety of women. But they put their entire lives into language for the other. This intangible, intense connection forms the basis of Ruhl’s “Dear Elizabeth” which dramatises the beauty wrought from simple correspondence.

First produced at Yale Repertory Theatre in 2012 and later in New York, director Ellen McDougall has added an extra dimension by casting a different pair of actors each night and having them perform unprepared. It’s a fascinating idea, one that can potentially give a real edge to the drama, yet it is easy to go over that edge and into the pitfalls that come with this experimental approach.

The actors (on the evening of this review; Phoebe Fox and Nina Bowers) discover the story of the person they are representing as they go along. This can occasionally be awkward but gives an authentic messiness to the performances which reflects the intended ‘life-as-it-is-lived’ intention of the piece. Fox and Bowers quickly fall into time with the rhythm of the text and shed their self-consciousness. However, the cold reading approach precludes us form caring about the characters and is an unfortunate roadblock before we even start on their journey. There is a flicker of redemption towards the end when Fox relates a desperately moving account of Elizabeth Bishop’s lover’s, Lota de Maceda Soares, suicide; but it is all a bit too late.

Surreal moments promise to break up the fairly static narrative; during which, in parlour game fashion, the actors react to stage directions they are given. But these theatrical devices fail to get to the heart of the matter. Bishop’s alcoholism is clumsily touched upon by the appearance of a bottle of rubbing alcohol and Lowell’s chronic depression earmarked by a pillbox of tablets spilled onto the table.

In an interview Ruhl professes to asking herself “why am I so captivated” by the poets’ lives. A rhetorical question with an obvious answer: the letters themselves are an intimately honest documentation of two bruised souls opening up to each other. In McDougall’s hands though, Ruhl might be prompted to ask the same question again.

 

Reviewed by Jonathan Evans

 

 

Dear Elizabeth

Gate Theatre until 9th February

 

 

Click here to see more of our latest reviews on thespyinthestalls.com