
Company
Gielgud Theatre
Reviewed – 17th October 2018
â
â
â
â
â
“the beauty of this musical (a real showcase of some of Sondheimâs finest numbers) is that the songs do not eclipse the characters”
A lot has been made of the gender swapping element of Marianne Elliottâs ground breaking production of Stephen Sondheimâs âCompanyâ. By his own admission, Sondheim was initially unsure that he wanted it to happen. His reservations were understandable: all too often you see theatre where the protagonist has been made female and it doesnât always work. It is to Elliottâs credit that he was persuaded to allow it (such was Sondheimâs faith in her) and the result is a brilliantly up to date reimagining of the work.
It seems that few alterations have been made to George Furthâs book. There are the obvious pronoun substitutions and lyrical changes, yet it is a seamless transformation – it is easy to forget that this version isnât how it was originally written. Although it is radical, it doesnât feel it. It feels natural and poignantly relevant, which is the ultimate compliment. Leave any preconceptions and debate at the door and just revel in the astonishing gorgeousness of this production.
In the absence of any real plot it relies on the sharp dialogue and characterisation and, of course, Sondheimâs inimitable score. Each song is a vignette â a stand-alone moment, but wedded to the narrative and given a sparkle of confetti by Bunny Christieâs ingenious âAlice in Wonderlandâ design.
Rosalie Craig plays Bobbie, the single, independent woman, as a bewildered onlooker; surveying the inexplicable bargaining, bickering, compromises, trade-offs, understandings and misunderstandings of her friendsâ marriages. She perfectly treads the path from amused derision through to a longing to be part of this weird world of wedded âblissâ. The dichotomy is heightened coming from the perspective of a woman aware of her biological clock ticking away on her thirty-fifth birthday. There is a spellbinding routine where Liam Steelâs choreography has four identically dressed versions of Bobbie appear to her in a dream as spirits of her future self; stuck in a clockwork loop of morose matrimony and motherhood. Craig gives a performance that will surely make her a West End fixture for quite some time.
But she is in good company. It is a show full of star turns. Jonathan Bailey showers the audience with the impossibly quick-fire lyrics of âGetting Married Todayâ with the lung capacity of a free-diver. George Blagden, Richard Fleeshman and Matthew Seadon-Young, as Bobbieâs three potential boyfriends offer a gloriously fresh take on “You Could Drive a Person Crazyâ. Patti Luponeâs âThe Ladies Who Lunchâ is an unforgettable cry of self-deprecatory discontent. But the beauty of this musical (a real showcase of some of Sondheimâs finest numbers) is that the songs do not eclipse the characters. Mel Giedroyc and Gavin Spokes as the abstemious argumentative couple in denial, Daisy Maywood and Ashley Campbell as the happily divorced couple, Jennifer Saayeng and Richard Henders as the doped-up, straight-laced couple are all hilarious yet touching (my word count is cautioning me to be self-editing here). The entire piece comes with an immense sense of fun, without losing any of the emotive power. Craigâs solos; âSomeone Is Waitingâ, âMarry Me a Littleâ and, of course âBeing Aliveâ, are achingly pure and heartfelt.
The friends that surround Bobbie repeatedly urge her to find somebody who will take care of her. âBut who will I take of?â she responds. I think itâs safe to say that the success of this show is well and truly taken care of. I hope nothing is booked into the Gielgud Theatre for the foreseeable future.
Craigâs Bobbie bookends many of the scenes with the simple, singular word âWowâ. I left the theatre with the same word resounding in my head. Sondheimâs musical and Elliottâs production is a perfect match.
Reviewed by Jonathan Evans
Photography by Brinkhoff Mogenburg
Company
Gielgud TheatreÂ

Quiz
Noël Coward Theatre
Reviewed – 11th April 2018
â
â
â
â
“a compelling presentation, full of sleight of hand that is often as manipulative as the subject matter itself”
Performance and presentation has become such a prominent part of public life now, that reality has become subjective. âConstructed realityâ, as a phrase, is relatively new and didnât exist at the time of the scandal of the âcoughing majorâ, the events of which form the backbone to James Grahamâs newest West End play, âQuizâ. But even though the phrase had yet to be coined, the trial of Charles and Diana Ingram accused of cheating on ITVâs âWho Wants to Be a Millionaire?â was still described by those who were there as âpure theatreâ.
Grahamâs stunning play truly reflects this. It is a whirlwind account of the drama that unfolded in both the courtrooms and the television studios, brilliantly highlighting the fact that the two are becoming more and more indistinguishable. The production, directed by Daniel Evans, is inspired and ingeniously constructed, using knockabout comedy to pinpoint the harsh truths of the false world we find ourselves living in. Robert Jonesâ set combines the courtroom and the game show as cleverly as Grahamâs writing, and even the audience are given a handheld device to pass judgement on the accused. Itâs 50:50 â guilty or not guilty. As simple as that.
Although it isnât quite so simple. We get to decide twice: at the interval and at the very end, and each time the verdict is different. The first act concentrates on the prosecution while the second act presents the same set of events from a different camera angle, inviting â or perhaps cajoling â us into rooting for the Ingrams. It is a disquietingly manipulative device, but we accept it.
The multi-tasking cast feast on their roles, relishing the vibrant array of characters they are depicting; from QC to Quizmaster (Keir Charles, for one, hilariously and perfectly capturing the tones and mannerisms of Chris Tarrant); contestant to conspirator, police officer to army general, among many others. We are also given a potted history of light entertainment, and how âWho Wants to Be a Millionaire?â, in particular, morphed into a global phenomenon. Far from being expositional it is all quite eye-opening.
But the focal point is the question mark that hangs over Charles Ingram winning the million-pound jackpot. We all know the historical reality of the guilty verdict but Gavin Spokes, as Charles Ingram, has to make us believe in him. And the beauty of his performance allows us to do just that. Assisted by Sarah Woodwardâs impassioned defence lawyer, we are driven to reject the reality and overturn the judgement. We are asked to choose a âmore entertaining lie over a less extraordinary truthâ.
But all the time we are reminded that this is theatre. As thought provoking as it is, it is utterly entertaining, insightful and immersive. It is a compelling presentation, full of sleight of hand that is often as manipulative as the subject matter itself, constantly toying with our perceptions of truth. But amid the mire of differing perspectives, one verdict is absolutely clear â âQuizâ is a sure-fire hit.
Reviewed by Jonathan Evans
Photography by Johan Persson

Quiz
Noël Coward Theatre until 16th June
Related