Tag Archives: Hannah Danson

WHILE THEY WERE WAITING

★★★★

Upstairs at the Gatehouse

WHILE THEY WERE WAITING

Upstairs at the Gatehouse

★★★★

“a tender and humorous reflection on the art of pausing”

At first glance, the set suggests a threshold to anywhere or nowhere. A yellow door stands centre stage, framed by a bench, clusters of plants, drifting clouds and scattered boxes. Designed by Hannah Danson, the world feels recognisable yet faintly imagined, like a memory of a waiting room rather than a literal one. It is grounded in realism but gently tips into the surreal.

Directed by Sydney Stevenson, the production leans confidently into this delicate balance between absurdism and emotional sincerity, allowing stillness and silence to sit comfortably alongside heightened comic exchanges.

Into this space steps Mulberry, played by Steve Furst. He welcomes us holding an umbrella without a canopy beneath the sound of falling rain. Furst fills the stage with assured presence and finely tuned comic expression. We quickly grasp the central condition of his existence: he does not know the time, yet he must wait. More than that, he has turned waiting into a hobby. He insists he enjoys it.

He is soon joined by Bix, performed by the play’s writer, Gary Wilmot. Wilmot not only stars in the production but makes his playwriting debut with While They Were Waiting. His character carries a lighter, more open energy, slightly dishevelled in unironed clothes and gently curious about his circumstances. Unlike Mulberry, Bix seems genuinely intrigued by the reason he is there.

The two men stand before the same yellow door, yet appear fundamentally opposed. They rarely agree, though they circle strikingly similar questions.

What is time? What defines a place? Is a location shaped by how we perceive it, or by how others see us within it? If I say I am here, but you see me as being there, where are we really?

Wilmot’s writing allows these philosophical ideas to unfold through rapid-fire banter and carefully timed jokes that dovetail neatly into one another. The dialogue balances absurdism with accessibility, layering small reflections beneath comic exchanges. Furst’s ability to undercut Mulberry’s rigid, almost authoritarian persona with flashes of pantomime-style humour is sharp and effective, while Wilmot plays Bix with warmth and a quiet emotional undercurrent.

Mulberry insists that waiting is a pastime; Bix suggests ringing the doorbell, something Mulberry claims to have already tried and firmly discourages repeating.

“But waiting is boring!” Bix protests.

And that question lingers. What do we do in the pauses? How do we inhabit the in-between spaces of our lives? Wilmot’s script proposes that it is precisely within these mundane liminal moments that life’s most profound truths reside.

There is deliberate repetition throughout, reinforcing the cyclical nature of waiting. It serves the themes well, though at times the patterns become predictable; certain jokes and exchanges feel anticipated before they land. Yet even within that familiarity, the performers’ chemistry sustains the rhythm.

At its heart, While They Were Waiting is an ode to life’s suspended moments, those stretches where we feel almost submerged in Lethe, the river of forgetfulness, unsure whether we wish to move forward or remain where we are. It becomes a heartfelt meditation on existence, grief, companionship and the quiet relief of leaning on another person.

There are flashes of genuine vulnerability that cut through the comedy. Occasionally, however, the script edges toward telling us how to feel rather than allowing emotion to surface organically. The most powerful moments arise in the subtext, in what is left unsaid, in the stillness between lines.

Blending absurdism, warmth and introspection, While They Were Waiting offers a tender and humorous reflection on the art of pausing. It suggests that perhaps waiting is not an interruption of life but life itself, happening quietly while we think nothing is happening at all.



WHILE THEY WERE WAITING

Upstairs at the Gatehouse

Reviewed on 3rd March 2026

by Nasia Ntalla

Photography by Simon Jackson


 

 

 

 

WHILE THEY WERE WAITING

WHILE THEY WERE WAITING

WHILE THEY WERE WAITING

DR FREUD WILL SEE YOU NOW, MRS HITLER

★★★★

Upstairs at the Gatehouse

DR FREUD WILL SEE YOU NOW, MRS HITLER

Upstairs at the Gatehouse

★★★★

“As an insight into the lives of both protagonists, it is a very worthwhile evening.”

From Laurence Marks and Maurice Gran, the writers of Birds of a Feather, Roll Over Beethoven, The New Statesman and a multitude of other celebrated TV comedy dramas, comes this new work, premiered at UATG.

It’s an odd one. Not a comedy, but with comic moments. Not an imagined story, but a fantasy setting of four seminal meetings of these two huge figures who, it could be said, actually changed the world. Not a play with tension – we know the ending for these characters, after all. And it also takes a bit of time to get into it. The opening scenes are clunky, if dramatic. But when it gets into its stride, this is a first class evening’s entertainment for anyone interested in these giants of 20th century history and how their actions still resonate now.

The basic premise of the play, directed by UATG’s artistic director Isaac Bernier-Doyle, is straightforward. As an infant, Adolf Hitler suffers from nightmares and bedwetting. Mrs Hitler (played by Nesba Crenshaw who skilfully transitions into Mrs Freud in subsequent scenes) takes him to the family doctor who recommends that the child attend a new nervous disorders clinic, run by you-know-who. Her extremely violent husband refuses to let her. But what if he had? Could proper psychological treatment have changed the course of history?

This is the clunky bit. Anna Freud (acted with great warmth by lovely Ruby Ablett) introduces and closes the play with this question. It is not very clear why the narrative arc is given to her to manage. And in the first of four main imaginary scenes of meetings between Hitler and Freud, the attempt to analyse Hitler doesn’t really hit the right note – although Hitler’s introduction into the scene as a child is suitably comic. Freud’s ‘analysis’ of Hitler is cursory, and we already know what is causing the problem.

After that, the drama gets going. Through successive encounters over the period leading up to the Second World War we see Hitler become the man he is going to be. His paranoia and inherited violent nature emerges; his belief that he is at core a misunderstood and rejected artist is given reign; and his need for attention and praise is on full display. So, actually, the answer to the ‘what if’ question is ‘no’. Because what you get here is snippets of the real lives and real personalities of Freud and Hitler. The research behind this play was impeccable and manifests in the coincidences that Marks and Gran have used to create the structure the play. As an insight into the lives of both protagonists, it is a very worthwhile evening.

What it is not, however, is a comedy. There are laughs and light moments. Apparently, Freud was known for his love of humour, but he makes bad jokes and the audience laughter was rare. I wondered if the subject matter at its heart was just too dark for us to laugh at it. Or maybe because the consequences of Hitler’s antisemitism still echo down this century.

A word about the key performances. Jonathan Taffler is Sigmund Freud. He really is. He was an utterly believable character, in turns ironic, arch and strong but always kind. Sam Mac as Hitler is completely watchable: needy, boastful, resentful and his outbursts of anger (cleverly echoed in a soundscape of Hitler’s actual speeches) are sinister. If he is trying to be funny, maybe we just can’t laugh at Hitler – although this is not the first such attempt. The set, too, is designed very skilfully – by Hannah Danson, with lighting by Simon Jackson – to allow out-of-sight scenes to play and it amplifies the darkness of the era.

In the closing scene, Anna brings forward one more coincidence. Freud died (at a place near ‘here’- Hampstead) in September 1939. Hitler ‘lived a little longer’.

 



DR FREUD WILL SEE YOU NOW, MRS HITLER

Upstairs at the Gatehouse

Reviewed on 10th September 2025

by Louise Sibley

Photography by Chromolume


 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

FOUR WOMEN AND A FUNERAL | ★★★ | August 2025
SHOUT! THE MOD MUSICAL | ★★★ | June 2025
ORDINARY DAYS | ★★★★ | April 2025
ENTERTAINING MURDER | ★★★ | November 2024
THE BOYS FROM SYRACUSE | ★★★ | September 2024
TOM LEHRER IS TEACHING MATH AND DOESN’T WANT TO TALK TO YOU | ★★ | May 2024
IN CLAY | ★★★★★ | March 2024
SONGS FOR A NEW WORLD | ★★★ | February 2024

 

 

DR FREUD

DR FREUD

DR FREUD