Tag Archives: Lara Bainbridge

DRAGON IN THE WOODS

★★½

Arches Lane Theatre

DRAGON IN THE WOODS

Arches Lane Theatre

★★½

“this was certainly an admirable effort”

What happens when the biggest obstacle to true love is yourself? Ben Rath poses us this question in “Dragon in the Woods”, a romantic comedy with a decently entertaining, albeit rambling, plot.

During a chance encounter on the tube, Patrick, also played by Rath, and Kat (Anna Head) hit it off right away under the mischievous gaze of Kat’s best friend, Sarah (Sheriya Clement-Pascall). From there ensues the coupling up of Patrick with Kat, and Sarah with Patrick’s best friend, Will (Jordan Baffana), before the former split up leaving the latter to pick up the pieces. Patrick finds success as a children’s book author and seemingly moves on with florist, Heather (Emma Alys Henderson), and Kat moves to New York. Her return then unearths the buried love between them – but will they finally be able to make it work?

Writer Rath, and director, Danny Jeffs, made their theatrical debut with this play of ‘right person, wrong time’. Commendable moments from Jeffs included the opening shadow sequence, but that was unfortunately never revisited, and his staging of Kat and Patrick’s first date. In an inspired choice, he had Head and Rath foray into the woods (the audience) with torches, before using a disco ball to create a starry night sky that enveloped the theatre and occasioned ‘oohs’ of appreciation – this is the very best of creative thinking and worldmaking that fringe theatre and small budgets often necessitate. The intimate moment was marred, however, by obtrusive and cliché sound design underscoring the dialogue, something which occurred a few times throughout. Furthermore, lengthy blackouts – often to interrupt numerous pretend stage kisses – slowed the play’s pace.

The script itself also suffered from a lack of narrative drive. Jumps in time occurred without much clear signposting, although the acting of Head and Rath helped somewhat to indicate emotional shifts in their relationship. The play’s messaging was left jumbled due to scenes that either meandered in a manner more suited to sitcom than stage, or changed direction suddenly in ways that felt quite contrived. Despite being guilty of this, the last scene’s twist was truly surprising and lent a bittersweet, cynically realistic resolution to the will-they-won’t-they back and forth between Kat and Patrick, and his wrestling between masculinity and emotional expression.

Rath played the emotionally-repressed Scouse lad well, but verged on appearing wooden onstage. Pace and energy certainly lagged in scenes between the central couple. The general lack of projection when speaking, approximating more the hypernaturalism of film than theatre, also left me struggling to hear the lines at times. Clement-Pascall and Baffana’s appearances were always welcome injections of much-needed dynamism, and they masterfully employed comic skill to bring out the humorous dimensions of Rath’s writing. Even still, comedic awkward pauses felt overplayed and overly long by the end, stunting the climactic dinner between all the characters and Head’s shining moment, who nevertheless tugged at heartstrings with a genuinely convincing breakdown after being rejected. This was strongly followed by Alys Henderson’s last appearance, playing Heather with real maturity and grace.

Overall, this was certainly an admirable effort, but both writer and director fell prey to repetition in their respective crafts, staging a play that felt more work-in-progress than polished final piece. There are certainly flickers of real promise, however, that could be developed with tighter writing and more stagecraft experience.



DRAGON IN THE WOODS

Arches Lane Theatre

Reviewed on 16th November 2025

by Lara Bainbridge

Photography by Danny Jeffs


 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

Insert relevant

 

 

DRAGON IN THE WOODS

DRAGON IN THE WOODS

DRAGON IN THE WOODS

LEE

★★★½

Park Theatre

LEE

Park Theatre

★★★½

“The script glimmers with astute judgements, informative history, and shrewd wit”

Cian Griffin’s new play, Lee, delights with an emotive and well-researched take on a formidable artist. However, much like the organised chaos of Krasner’s recreated studio and Abstract Expressionist paintings, the show’s message at times felt jumbled and hard to discern.

Springs, New York, 1969: 13 years after the death of her husband, Jackson Pollock, Krasner is working on her latest painting, ‘Portrait in Green’. Hank, local delivery boy and art student, interrupts Krasner’s flow to seek advice on his portfolio and authenticate a painting given by Pollock to settle a debt with Hank’s father. The play weaves together imagined conversations between Krasner, Pollock and Hank, exploring her continued fight to make men see the worth in the work of female artists. The question remains, however: what freedoms lie in store for Krasner should she herself shake the weight of valuing their opinions?

Before a word is spoken, Jason Moore’s insightful direction sets the scene as Pollock (Tom Andrews) wanders onstage to cast an ever-critical eye upon Krasner’s paintings. Setting up their power struggle, Krasner, played by Olivier-nominated Helen Goldwyn, sets foot onstage with instant stage presence. In a captivating moment of live painting, Goldwyn lays down long brushstrokes with the unstudied air of a great artist’s intuition. The play certainly shines in its exciting and unique interactions – if only there had been more of them – with Ian Nicholas’ exceptional set design. There is certainly a commendable eye for detail in recreating Krasner’s Springs studio, with copies of Lee Krasner’s artworks and paint splatters on the floor that concretise the space and anchor the imagined action.

In 85 minutes, Griffin packs in a lot, although perhaps too much. Dialogue moves through meditations upon the artist’s raison d’être, Hank’s relationship with his father, Krasner’s with Pollock, the sexism of the American art scene. The script glimmers with astute judgements, informative history, and shrewd wit. This is excellently brought out in pacy back-and-forths between Goldwyn, superbly convincing as an acerbic Krasner, and Andrews, hands shaking from Pollock’s excessive alcoholism as he holds cigarettes to his sour face. Will Bagnall provides a welcome relief to the artists’ pessimism, perfectly embodying a young artist’s creative passion and naivety in a wide-eyed stare and shy smile.

That said, emotional highs and lows feel unexpectedly sudden at times, and the play’s structure could be improved for clarity. Pollock appears rather sporadically throughout the play, in scenes that can detract from a clear understanding and progression between the production’s main plot points. It is also clear Griffin completed extensive research, although evidence of such felt a touch heavy-handed at times. This historical reimagining, interspersing fantasy and reality, made it difficult to decipher fact from fiction – although perhaps this device was employed to encourage the audience to investigate further, which I certainly did.

The play’s attempt to centralise the too-oft marginalised ‘wife’ to the celebrity male artist is mostly successful, albeit obscured at times by the interwoven storylines of the male parts themselves. Overall, Lee is worth the watch – it draws audiences into the wonderful wit, work and world of Lee Krasner, bringing her out of the shadows and shedding light upon her enormous influence on generations of artists.



LEE

Park Theatre

Reviewed on 30th September 2025

by Lara Bainbridge

Photography by Giacomo Giannelli


 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

(GOD SAVE MY) NORTHERN SOUL | ★★ | September 2025
VERMIN | ★★★★ | September 2025
THE GATHERED LEAVES | ★★★★ | August 2025
LOST WATCHES | ★★★ | August 2025
THAT BASTARD, PUCCINI! | ★★★★★ | July 2025
OUR COSMIC DUST | ★★★ | June 2025
OUTPATIENT | ★★★★ | May 2025
CONVERSATIONS AFTER SEX | ★★★ | May 2025
FAREWELL MR HAFFMANN | ★★★★ | March 2025
ONE DAY WHEN WE WERE YOUNG | ★★★ | March 2025

 

 

LEE

LEE

LEE