Tag Archives: New Wimbledon Theatre

HIJINKS & CAVIAR

β˜…β˜…

New Wimbledon Theatre

HIJINKS & CAVIAR at the New Wimbledon Theatre

β˜…β˜…

“In defence of the actors, they lacked nothing in energy and commitment, which they maintained throughout”

The best way, perhaps, to understand Hijinks and Caviar – a piece of new writing from duo Moody & Moody of Fluffy TOP Productions – is to see it as an approximation of an Agatha Christie period piece, but, alas, with none of the charm, intellect, or indeed, mystery. The play opens in mid 1920s England with the ambiguous death of Lady Mary (not of Downton Abbey fame, thankfully), whose husband has rudely read her diary and believes she was murdered (she had a long list of lovers/enemies). He quickly enacts a plan to invite all these people over to dinner and identify the murderer. Part of this identification seems to hinge upon someone having a flower tattooed on their thigh. I really can’t explain that bit further.

The guests gather, and their host never shows up (you’ll never guess why) whilst the three members of staff waddle about being confused. I don’t really know what happened for the next hour and a half, but people marched around with torches, and there was lots of bickering. But when they weren’t bickering or making asinine (and repetitive) remarks, they were singing. And dancing. Which I don’t think Agatha was quite as hot on.

A musical number, and indeed a musical, can be wonderful. But I don’t think even Les Mis, or Jesus Christ Superstar – which are entirely sung-through– had as many songs as Hijinks and Caviar. There were ten principal cast members in total, and each one had at least two solo pieces, as well as multiple ensemble numbers. And, as with a lot of new writing, the musical numbers are nothing special, and all blur into one monotonous chorus. This was no exception. There were just so many songs, and they did nothing to advance the plot. Or maybe they did, but I really couldn’t follow the plot, so I wouldn’t know.

The dialogue itself was not much better. It had about three gags which were regurgitated throughout. Every character was reduced to a lazy caricature of a 1920s Christie-esque figure. Each one seemed only to have one facet, and stuck to it throughout: for example, Lady Longfeather (Hayley Pettitt) is obsessed with etiquette yet only speaks in order to demand another drink, and thus gets progressively sloshed. Then she has to sing a song whilst sloshed. Mr Benny Factor (Danny Da’Val), on the other hand, is characterised as a dandy, but just makes continuous lude remarks to every female character. In defence of the actors, they lacked nothing in energy and commitment, which they maintained throughout. And no one looked like they envied the corpse, which was a relief.

Without revealing whodunnit, the ending seemed to me a frankly bizarre knock-off of Christie’s The Mousetrap, which remains London’s (in fact the world’s) longest running play for a reason.

Hijinks and Caviar is a new piece of theatre, and it is intended to be ridiculous. Unfortunately, it wasn’t clever enough to pull off absurdism, nor was it organised enough to pull off murder-mystery. There was definitely some fun in it, and occasionally, some decent humour. Perhaps its silliness does appeal to some, but its faltering structure, endless singing, and unoriginal dialogue, makes this a bit implausible.

 

HIJINKS & CAVIAR at theΒ New Wimbledon Theatre

Reviewed on 21st October 2024

by Violet Howson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

PLEADING STUPIDITY | β˜…β˜…β˜… | October 2024
AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN | β˜…β˜… | April 2024

HIJINKS & CAVIAR

HIJINKS & CAVIAR

Click here to see our Recommended Shows page

 

PLEADING STUPIDITY

β˜…β˜…β˜…

New Wimbledon Theatre

PLEADING STUPIDITY at the New Wimbledon Theatre

β˜…β˜…β˜…

“absurd and delightful in equal measure”

Pleading Stupidity is, as the title suggests, ever so silly.

From Maybe You Like It Productions, this is the true story of two very stupid boys (classic) on their gap year (very classic) working in a small skiing town in Colorado (also pretty classic), who underestimate the excitement such a town provides, and rashly decide upon robbing a bank for some extracurricular fun (a little less classic).

The story itself screams comedy: the case was solved in eight minutes owing to the titular stupidity of these Australian students-cum-bank robbers – inspired by Patrick Swayze in Point Break. But, unlike their hero, they lack common sense in all its forms. Chad (Jamie De Villiers) and Brad (Robert Merriam) end up holding bank workers Kelly (Lili Herbert) and Anna (Ellie Jay Cooper) at BB-gun point, still wearing their name tags from work, and dressed in skiing attire. The only Australians in town, there is never any mystery to solve, and they are quickly caught and arrested. But such unrelenting idiocy is a source of great hilarity, in which no comic stone is left unturned. Whilst there is some discussion of the dubiousness of their defence (stupidity) helped largely by being young, white men from Australia, this show is not really a commentary on the justice system, or male incompetence. It is purely a very amusing romp through this ridiculous crime, in which any seriousness is subsumed into delightful absurdity.

This four-person multi-rolling cast is fabulous as they charge across the stage manically, darting from character to character, in the likeness of those free electrons in metals which conduct energy really quickly (credits to GCSE Chemistry). The show is frenetic in the best way, and your attention is easily maintained throughout.

Pleading Stupidity has a delicious self-consciousness to it, harnessing meta-theatrical commentary wherever possible. From the start, the characters bicker over who should deliver exposition, and announce the coming of the next dramatic montage. It’s all wonderfully inventive, squeezing absolutely all it can out of its small inventory of props and cast members.

The stage is sparse, relying upon four multifunctional boxes to indicate different settings. But these are utilised with much success, as, for example, a pretzel stand seamlessly becomes a toilet then into an airport desk, and back to a pretzel stand. Props and costume are also subtly employed to indicate character changes, to great (and comic) effect.

As delightfully silly as this show is, I do wonder if it has a life that is sustainable or suitable outside of fringe settings. On its regional tour, this London stint took place in the New Wimbledon Theatre’s studio space, which is used to showcase new writing. This suited the piece very well. But the lack of emotional depth and the slightly confused ending does leave the show without much lasting impact. As clever and watchable as this irreverent play is, there is a notable absence in what it seeks to achieve, and its ending feels a little anticlimactic.

That said, Pleading Stupidity is absurd and delightful in equal measure. It’s not Beckett, but it is great fun, and a thoroughly enjoyable evening.

 


PLEADING STUPIDITY at the New Wimbledon Theatre then UK Tour continues

Reviewed on 8th October 2024

by Violet Howson

Photography by Lucy Hayes

 

 


 

 

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN | β˜…β˜… | April 2024

PLEADING STUPIDITY

PLEADING STUPIDITY

Click here to see our Recommended Shows page