Tag Archives: Royal Court Theatre

BLUE MIST

★★★★

Stratford East

BLUE MIST

Stratford East

★★★★

“bursts with life and complexity”

Olivier nominated ‘Blue Mist’ makes its second UK tour stop after a sold out 2023 Royal Court premiere. It’s a timely, important piece that shifts the conversation around British South Asian Muslim experience, reclaiming and rehumanising the narrative. Already strong, with a few tweaks it could be exceptional.

Disillusioned J has almost given up on his dream of becoming a journalist – until his brothers from other mothers, Rash and Sif, convince him to enter a prestigious competition with a pitch on shisha safe spaces. When he wins, it feels like his big break – until producers insist on a more “honest” narrative. Will J break the cycle or become part of it?

Mohamed-Zain Dada’s script radiates humanity, centring three young Muslim men who love, tease and support each other despite their differences. Their care for their community feels lived in, as do the dialogue and cultural references. It’s also wickedly funny. The surreal streak mostly works, though the Daft Punk heads and Disneyfied vocal detour feel like bigger leaps of logic. However the play’s textured, joyfully complex portrayal of British Muslim life deserves celebration.

Milli Bhatia’s direction draws out the trio’s bond with wholesome clarity. The epitome of brothers-from-other-mothers, their easy warmth creates some deeply human moments – like discussing Rash’s plan for an aunties-only safe space. The contrasting surrealist angle adds contemporary bite, though tonal shifts could sometimes use finessing – the sing-songy ‘A Spoonful of Muslim’ feels like a leap, and though the ceiling closing in is a powerful metaphor, keeping it shut leaves the world harder to read. Similarly, more static scenes could do with clearer contextual cues. Still, it’s a distinctive and compelling directorial voice.

Theophilus O. Bailey’s movement direction really shines, opening with a gorgeous, ballet esque tableau of male grace before shifting into a slick mix of styles. The movement sits naturally within scenes – though some are overly static – and there’s comical contrast through Fiona and Mike, as well as punchy, modern transition sequences.

Tomás Palmer’s design is stunning, with sunken shisha lounge and neon lighting. Different levels create striking visuals – especially the trio rising from the blue mist. The lowered ceiling adds boxing ring tension, though makes other scenes trickier to interpret. Elliot Griggs’ lighting is narrative and artistic, guiding the story with subtle pulses, and heightening the drama with sharper bursts and contrasts. Elena Peña’s sound brims with youthful swagger, though occasionally a little too loudly. The costumes add Western and South Asian flair.

Omar Bynon gives Jihad conflicted weight, played with conviction even if the climactic scene could use a touch more grounding. Azan Ahmed meets the material with striking honesty, delivering an endearing Rashid who’s genuinely trying to change after a teenage mistake. Kashif Ghole’s Asif nails the comedy, while admitting he doesn’t have all the answers and letting us in on his heartbreak. Sanjeev Bhaskar lends his voice as Chunky, full of life and warmth even in absence.

‘Blue Mist’ bursts with life and complexity, sharpened by a refreshingly surreal edge. It’s a sharply drawn portrait of humanity that will resonate widely. Make sure you catch it on tour!



BLUE MIST

Stratford East

Reviewed on 11th July 2026

by Hannah Bothelton

Photography by Ali Wright


 

 

 

 

Blue Mist

Blue Mist

Blue Mist

AFTER THE ACT

★★

Royal Court

AFTER THE ACT

Royal Court

★★

“it remains an interesting and worthwhile history lesson”

Jenny lives with Eric and Martin was just another children’s book in 1988. It wasn’t new and wasn’t even originally British, as it had first been published in Copenhagen in 1982. So how did this book become the starting point of a campaign, which ultimately led to the inclusion of Section 28 within the Local Government Act of 1988? After the Act is an entertaining musical, which tells the story of Section 28 through the eyes of those most closely affected.

‘Section 28’ refers to a specific clause with the Local Government Act of 1988, which prohibited schools from ‘promoting’ homosexuality, the wording of which was ambiguous enough that it resulted in the restriction of teaching of the acceptability of homosexuality, particularly concerning family relationships.

It is a strange era to look back on. Views that would be considered to be politically extreme nowadays were front and centre and were actually winning the argument. An imaginary enemy had been conjured up, largely driven by ignorance and misunderstanding. After the Act explores this period of recent history from multiple vital perspectives: teachers who could not speak up for risk of jeopardising their careers, students for whom bullying and discrimination had become a part of their everyday existence and the activists who fought hard to educate people and bring about real change.

The play splits fairly evenly into two halves. In the first act, we see the build-up to the passing of the Act in 1988. The tone is set clearly early in the play. People’s concerns about gay people are not challenged, whereas protestors are dismissed as mad rabble-rousers. Two scenes stand out in the first act. The first is where protestors have made it on the news at 6 on the BBC but are being silenced (fitting for the time) to not disrupt the broadcast. The second is the re-enactment of protestors abseiling into the House of Lords following the passing of the bill. These scenes are excellently written (Billy Barrett and Ellice Stevens) paying tribute to the real-life activists involved.

The second act covers the aftermath to the passing of the Act before it was eventually repealed in 2003, detailing the experiences of people who had to live through this time period and how it affected them well beyond the law had been changed. This should be the point where it all comes together. However, the biggest issue is the contradiction between its comedic elements and the hard-hitting truths that it wishes to divulge. The tone of most of the first act is strangely uplifting and funny, which is maintained through to the start of the second act, when one of the performers enters the stage dressed as Margaret Thatcher and sings as the former Prime Minister.

The individual elements of the play are interesting and well-performed, and all of the cast display an impressive range as they move from character to character bringing to life more people’s stories from this period. However, these parts often work against each other without a clear link to the central narrative, rather appearing more like a slide show of different characters.

Keyboard and drums add a lively accompaniment to the performances on stage. Sadly, the backing music and use of songs is often overdone and is too much of an ‘ever-present’ during the show rather peaking for significant moments, which does make it a little tiring, giving the show an impression of ‘more bark than bite’. Overall, despite its flaws as a production, it remains an interesting and worthwhile history lesson, which deserves to be taught.



AFTER THE ACT

Royal Court

Reviewed on 27th May 2025

by Luke Goscomb

Photography by Alex Brenner

 

 


 

 

 

 

Last ten shows reviewed at this venue:

MANHUNT | ★★★★ | April 2025
A GOOD HOUSE | ★★★★ | January 2025
THE BOUNDS | ★★★ | June 2024
LIE LOW | ★★★★ | May 2024
BLUETS | ★★★ | May 2024
GUNTER | ★★★★ | April 2024
COWBOIS | ★★★★★ | January 2024
MATES IN CHELSEA | ★★★ | November 2023
CUCKOO | ★★½ | July 2023
BLACK SUPERHERO | ★★★★ | March 2023

 

 

AFTER THE ACT

AFTER THE ACT

AFTER THE ACT