Tag Archives: Brigid Larmour

THE OLD LADIES

★★★½

Finborough Theatre

THE OLD LADIES

Finborough Theatre

★★★½

“not a comfortable watch, but it’s a quietly unsettling one that refuses to loosen its grip”

“Thank goodness I shall never be a woman”, said critic Harris Deans upon seeing the original production of The Old Ladies. I am a woman, so I couldn’t make the same exclamation, but as I left the theatre 90 years after he did, I did join him in thanking goodness that I would never be an old woman in 1935.

The Finborough Theatre never presents work that’s had a full run in London during the last 25 years, so they’re experts at mining up forgotten favourites and genuinely neglected works from the 19th and 20th centuries. The Old Ladies was written by playwright Rodney Ackland (who went on to work with Alfred Hitchcock), adapted from Hugh Walpole’s 1924 novel of the same name. Three aging women live in uncomfortable proximity to each other with nothing much to report on, and plenty of waiting to do – a combination that breeds nosiness and distrust.

The morbid atmosphere hung heavy in the auditorium before the lights even came up, thanks to the dark drapes flanking the stage filled with fussy furniture desperate to trip you up. Juliette Demoulin’s design keeps the drama contained by the domestic, pointing the finger at the systems that force these women into the same place. It doesn’t surprise me that Ackland envisaged adapting his work as an early film noir, as the sense of dread builds stealthily once the women begin to interact.

Initially, there is warmth and humour as the peculiarity and frankness of those in old age is made apparent, but the play quickly descends into a depressing and claustrophobic compression. May (Catherine Cusack) is nauseatingly frightful, and Lucy (Julia Watson) is pitiably optimistic given her son’s unexplained absence. Abigail Thaw’s Agatha is disconcertingly intense, and director Brigid Lamour’s decision to have her dozing in the background of scenes she didn’t feature in made the audience as nervous as poor Lucy. All three had me torn between wanting to shake them or to run a mile from them, so it’s safe to say the character portrayals were absurdly affecting. Carla Joy Evans’ costume design enhanced the three women’s attempts to hold on to lasting identities while still maintaining the monochromatic feel. Mark Dymock’s lighting was most notable for successfully making the actors look much older and more weary than they did at curtain call.

Max Pappenheim’s subtle sound design tracked the route from ordinariness to intensity, as we watched this story of poverty become something much more grim. The direction and performances collectively pace this turn from domestic tale to psychological drama carefully, leaving the audience in a twilight zone of uncertainty for much of the action, as they are left unsure which it truly is. The eeriness does pay off in the final scenes, but it feels like more of a relief than a satisfaction.

It’s rare that a play makes me so thankful I live in the present time period, given that many of them were written and set a long time ago, and suffer from the cursed rose tinted glasses of nostalgia. But this production is quite unyielding in its bleakness. It doesn’t take too much of a stretch to see The Old Ladies as a warning, as it points its finger harshly at the potential consequences of a limited life – be that economic or social limits – and warns us how grim old age can really get. It’s not a comfortable watch, but it’s a quietly unsettling one that refuses to loosen its grip.



THE OLD LADIES

Finborough Theatre

Reviewed on 26th March 2026

by Jessica Hayes

Photography by Carla Joy Evans


 

 

 

 

THE OLD LADIES

THE OLD LADIES

THE OLD LADIES

The Merchant of Venice 1936

★★★★

Watford Palace Theatre

THE MERCHANT OF VENICE 1936 at the Watford Palace Theatre

★★★★

Merchant of Venice 1936

“A vivid and moving interpretation. Disturbing, enriching and thought provoking”

 

Tracy-Ann Oberman’s Shylock stands centre stage at the opening of Brigid Larmour’s brave and provoking adaptation of Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice”; and from thereon she remains in full command of, not just the action, but the unresolved themes. Themes that she manages to turn on their head. It has long been debated whether the play is anti-Semitic or whether it is about anti-Semitism. This show removes the question from the context of the drama and places it smack bang into society as a whole.

Shylock is living under the shadow of fascism in London’s East End in 1936. Greta Zabulyte’s video backdrops, with Sarah Weltman’s soundscape, evoke the tensions that lead up to the battle of Cable Street, in which anti-fascist protesters successfully blockaded a rally of Oswald Mosley’s Blackshirts. It is particularly shocking to be reminded that this took place on our home ground. The scenes have more than an echo of Kristallnacht. This political landscape shapes our understanding of the text and gives the characters more depth than even Shakespeare could have imagined.

Oberman gives Shylock due reason for her outrage and desire for revenge. Although she doesn’t shy away from highlighting the less savoury aspects of her personality, she is far less villainous than her persecutors. “If you prick us, do we not bleed” carries a chilling resonance in this setting. Antonio (Raymond Coulthard) and his band of Old Etonians are simultaneously ridiculous and sinister. In particular, Xavier Starr, as Gratiano, captures the essence of the bumbling Bunbury Boy in whose deceptively likeable hands, privilege can become a dangerous weapon. Hannah Morrish cuts a striking Portia, overflowing with aristocratic advantage. A true Mitford sister, you almost expect Joseph Goebbels to spring out from behind the curtain. Antonio, whose “pound of flesh” is so famously demanded of Shylock, comes out slightly more favourably. Coulthard mangers to convey, with subtle facial expressions, a half-hidden dissatisfaction with his victory in court.

Liz Cooke’s set moves between the East End streets and Portia’s brightly lit salons. The more light that is shed on the stage, however, the less we see of the underlying tensions. Some scenes dip, and consequently pull back Larmour’s passionately paced staging. But, with skilful editing the problematical finale with its dubious happy ending is replaced with something far, far more powerful. Oberman refuses to let Shylock be written out of the story, and she remains perched on the edge of the stage – a formidable presence – until she returns to lead the resistance to Mosley’s ‘Blackshirts’. It is a significant and unsettling adjunct to the story.

“The Merchant of Venice” is a difficult text, with difficult characters. Four hundred years before it was written, the entire Jewish community had been expelled from England, and not officially readmitted until the mid-seventeenth century. Four hundred years after it was written, the human drama is crucially relevant. Shakespeare’s play is contradictory, but Larmour’s, and Oberman’s, message is clear as glass. Shattering that glass doesn’t diminish it – the relevance is reflected, if not magnified, in each jagged fragment. This is a vivid and moving interpretation. Disturbing, enriching and thought provoking.

 

 

Reviewed on 2nd March 2023

by Jonathan Evans

Photography by Marc Brenner

 

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

 

Beauty and the Beast | ★★★★ | December 2022

 

Click here to read all our latest reviews