Tag Archives: Julian Starr

SEAGULL: TRUE STORY

★★★★★

Marylebone Theatre

SEAGULL: TRUE STORY

Marylebone Theatre

★★★★★

“Sharp satire and ebullient humour contrast with raw humanity”

Alexander Molochnikov and Eli Rarey’s chaotic but compelling ‘Seagull: True Story’ explodes in a defiant, politically charged, semi-autobiographical reinvention of Chekhov’s revolutionary classic. If Chekhov holds up a mirror to humanity, Molochnikov and Rarey smash it, reflecting a modern world fractured by political and emotional upheaval.

With a stage apron transformed into a boudoir, ‘Seagull: True Story’ promises a spectacle. But will it be heartfelt and vulnerable, like the haunting opening ballad sung in Russian by a middle-aged man? Or a glittery circus, like the flamboyant MC who crashes the stage yelling “fantastic”? The tension between truth and theatrics permeates each scene as we chart the artistic rise and unravelling of young Russian director Kon and his friend Anton. Their radical interpretation of Chekhov’s ‘Seagull’ is threatened when Putin invades Ukraine. Their choices are speak out, be silenced or leave. Anton chooses the former; Kon the latter. But will Kon find artistic freedom in America? And what will he sacrifice to achieve it?

Inspired by Chekhov’s tragicomedy ‘The Seagull’, ‘Seagull True Story’ offers a fractured, provocative and sometimes unsettling commentary on freedom of expression in our modern world. Creator Molochnikov and writer Rarey unflinchingly reinvigorate Chekhov’s characters and themes, weaving disillusionment, sacrifice, and the conflict between truth and tradition into current geopolitics. Sharp satire and ebullient humour contrast with raw humanity, leaving you off-kilter but deeply affected by the unfolding tragedy. If anything, its pre-Trump penning misses a trick in skirting a sharper critique of American democracy. But with so much to unpack, it earns its pardon.

Molochnikov’s direction conjures contradiction, from pulsating parody to sombre and serious. The most powerful characters display the least humanity. As much is said by a glance as by a monologue. The inspired use of the house curtain, flipping aside to conceal and reveal, is a veil Kon never controls. Most of the action takes place in front of said curtain, the stark stage behind exposing the chasm between art and reality. Characters rushing into the audience and ripping out cables further blur the line between fact and fiction.

Fedor Zhuravlev’s compositions are perfectly familiar and foreign, driving and adrift. Noize MC’s cutting lyrics introduce fresh perspectives into a world of self-absorption, and the group rap sections echo Greek chorus. Ohad Mazor’s contemporary choreography injects expertly executed vitality and flow.

Alexander Shishkin’s set design is both rich and stark, the pre-curtain evoking theatricality, communism, Trumpism, and even exploitation and death; the post-curtain giving way to bare brutalism. Plastic screens and props evoke pollution, suffocation and the flimsiness of truth. Yet it’s also surreal, a bath whizzing through a party and a goldfish bowl sporting a buoyant balloon.

Alex Musgrave’s lighting perfectly echoes these contradictions, ranging from dramatic and effusive to cold and isolating. It effectively creates new spaces in the minimal set. Julian Starr’s sound design adds a continual layer of realism (I especially love the little splashes in the bath), punctuated by showy flourishes which reassert the falseness of the theatre. It’s a little loud in places but the cast’s projection usually overcomes this. Kristina Kharlashkina’s costumes range from realistic to grandiose, some characters true to life and the rest varying significantly in tone and silhouette, especially as war breaks.

The cast is magnificent, bringing this complex piece to life on many levels. Daniel Boyd’s Kon is haunted, his desperation suffocating him as reality closes in. Ingeborga Dapkūnaitė’s Olga is a masterclass in subtext, her initial horror at the war masked by forced cheer, making the silences between mother and son scream. Stella Baker’s Nico brings a knowing edge to her embodiment of the ingénue. Andrey Burkovskiy’s MC manages to bring a menacing quality to his relentless cheer. Elan Zafir’s Anton is heartbreakingly steadfast and the emotional soul of the piece.

Like Chekhov, Molochnikov’s ‘Seagull: True Story’ offers a lot to chew on if you’re up to the challenge. This heartbreaking, mesmerising, unflinching reimagining will haunt you like ‘The Seagull’ haunts Kon.



SEAGULL: TRUE STORY

Marylebone Theatre

Reviewed on 9th September 2025

by Hannah Bothelton

Photography provided by Seagull: True Story


 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

A ROLE TO DIE FOR | ★★★★ | July 2025
ALICE IN WONDERLAND | ★★★ | July 2025
FAYGELE | ★★★★★ | May 2025
WHITE ROSE | ★★ | March 2025
WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ANNE FRANK | ★★★★ | October 2024
THE GOVERNMENT INSPECTOR | ★★★★ | May 2024
THE DREAM OF A RIDICULOUS MAN | ★★★★ | March 2024
A SHERLOCK CAROL | ★★★★ | November 2023
THE DRY HOUSE | ★★½ | April 2023

 

 

SEAGULL

SEAGULL

SEAGULL

FOUR PLAY

★★½

King’s Head Theatre

FOUR PLAY

King’s Head Theatre

★★½

“tackles some fascinating and thorny issues revolving around queer relationships, but its execution is shallow”

Question: ‘Did you ever sleep with anyone else, during the 7 (and a half) years we were together?

Answer: I hated A Little Life

End Scene

What? That’s not profund? It just makes no sense.

Jake Brunger’s Four Play, as the name suggests, is about the colliding sex lives of gay couple, Rafe (Lewis Cornay) and Pete (Zheng Xi Yong), with Michael (Daniel Bravo)– the ‘hot one’ – and his partner, Andy (Jo Foster). It opens with Rafe and Pete propositioning Michael to sleep with both of them individually, so they can experience sex with other men, having only ever been monogamous with each other. Psst, don’t tell Andy.

Directed by Jack Sain, Four Play’s first act is promising, especially the allure of the opening sequence, in which the three men dance about with exercise balls. Michael quickly agrees to the proposal of one-time sex, and the play follows the devolution of the intertwined relationships between the four.

The second act, however, disintegrated more dramatically than any of the relationships. The primary diagnosis for Four Play is bad writing. Filtered through cliché, the characters are undeveloped which makes it near impossible to provoke interest in their sex lives and their secret liaisons. I don’t take pleasure in devaluing a play that confronts stereotypes about gay men, but this piece felt symptomatic of some of the most depressing facets of our epoch. Though there is ostensible exploration of the emotional tangle of queer open relationships, Andy – supposedly the injured party – is vapid and uncritical, cloaking ignorance with some worthy diatribe against the apparent pretentiousness of liking Ottolenghi and Chablis. That is one of the alarming facets: anti-pretentiousness. Anti-pretentiousness, in this case, is just anti-intellectualism promenading as social commentary.

The actors do their best with the material. Foster is spritely and contrasts well with Bravo’s aloof composure. Cornay is endearing in his awkwardness, also in contrast to the corporate soullessness of Pete. Set and costume design (Peiyao Wang) are highlights, especially Foster’s outfits. The interior décor is suitably chic and modern, complementing the piece’s tone.

The overriding message of the play, Brunger holds, is to respect your partner and always be honest. But there is no plausible redemptive arc for these characters, and they all remain objectionable. The relationships felt symptomatic of our societal objection to feeling and to difficult emotion in the name of ‘protecting our peace’. Not one of these characters have an engaged conversation: they just talk at each other and leave. No one is changed by the end.

Theatre doesn’t have to be radical or revolutionary, but it should be observational in some way; usually, it observes convention from an unconventional lens – in this case, we have sex, monogamy, and ‘modern’ relationships from a non-heteronormative lens. But it lacks nuance. The rusting away of a woman’s ovaries is casually dropped for humour; Hitler and Nazi uniforms as a kink are mentioned in poor taste; metaphors obscure rather than elucidate. At one point, Andy, with lustre, says ‘Spiders are scary. Terrorism is scary. Cancer is really scary. Monogamy?’ As if monogamy could only be held in opposition to these three wildly divergent examples of scariness and thus be deemed unscary. But monogamy can – and perhaps should – be intimidating, and that’s a fascinating discourse in itself, not to be undermined.

Four Play tackles some fascinating and thorny issues revolving around queer relationships, but its execution is shallow.



FOUR PLAY

King’s Head Theatre

Reviewed on 16th July 2025

by Violet Howson

Photography by Jack Sain

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Last ten shows reviewed at this venue:

REMYTHED | ★★★★ | May 2025
THE GANG OF THREE | ★★★★ | May 2025
(THIS IS NOT A) HAPPY ROOM | ★★★ | March 2025
FIREBIRD | ★★★★ | January 2025
LOOKING FOR GIANTS | ★★★ | January 2025
LADY MONTAGU UNVEILED | ★★★ | December 2024
HOW TO SURVIVE YOUR MOTHER | ★★★ | October 2024
TWO COME HOME | ★★★★★ | August 2024
THE PINK LIST | ★★★★ | August 2024
ENG-ER-LAND | ★★★ | July 2024

 

 

FOUR PLAY

FOUR PLAY

FOUR PLAY