Tag Archives: Christopher Poke

WALKING EACH OTHER HOME

★★★

Old Red Lion Theatre

WALKING EACH OTHER HOME

Old Red Lion Theatre

★★★

“a thoughtful and heartfelt piece”

Tim Graves’ Walking Each Other Home opens by inviting us into a set that immediately establishes the emotional terrain of the play: a modest family living room designed by Jason Marc-Williams and Noah Cousins. Beside the sofa sits a cluster of cards featuring family members, a simple but effective visual device that hints at memory, loss and fractured relationships before a word is spoken.

We first meet Frank Maloney, played by Christopher Poke, an elderly man living with early-stage dementia. Poke gives Frank a layered and deeply sympathetic presence. At times bewildered, at times lucid, Frank drifts between confusion and clarity, uncertain of the day, the moment, or even who is standing in front of him.

Into this uneasy domestic space arrives Frank’s son Michael, played by Edward Fisher, returning from Peru with a backpack and years of unresolved pain. From the outset, we understand that Frank often believes Michael is dead, a heartbreaking symptom of his condition. Their reunion is therefore not one of warmth but of collision: old wounds resurface immediately, and bitterness between father and son dominates the room. Michael’s sexuality, and Frank’s historic discomfort with it, becomes one of the central fault lines of the drama.

What emerges between them is not only estrangement but an ongoing contest. Father and son seem locked in a competitive game for emotional ground: who has been more wronged, who deserves understanding, who can wound the other first.

Graves begins the play at a high emotional pitch, with anger and trauma already fully ignited. While this gives the opening urgency, it also leaves limited room for the tension to build further. Much of the play therefore sustains the same heightened emotional register rather than developing through shifts in rhythm or surprise.

The production finds welcome contrast in Sandeep Singh, Frank’s live-in carer, played with warmth and precision by Amrik Tumber. Sandeep provides much-needed lightness through dry humour, wit and emotional intelligence, and many of the play’s jokes land sharply and effectively. Sandeep also acts as a mirror to Michael. Where Michael has travelled across the world searching for peace and belonging, unable to find acceptance at home, Sandeep embodies a quieter certainty rooted in family, responsibility and inner balance. Their contrast is one of the play’s most interesting dynamics.

Frank frequently speaks of “visitors” and seeing other people in the room. Whether these figures are hallucinations, memories or something more spiritual is left intriguingly open. Combined with Michael’s interest in Amazonian shamanism and Sandeep’s Sikh faith, these moments give the play an ambitious metaphysical dimension.

There are scenes of real beauty here. Poke is especially moving when Frank confronts his own reflection and no longer recognises himself. Tumber also shines in moments of blunt honesty and tenderness. Fisher captures Michael’s pain convincingly, though the character can feel more symbolic than fully grounded.

Marc-Williams’ direction handles the emotional themes with sincerity, and the play’s core concerns are compelling: intergenerational trauma, forgiveness, queer identity and the need for support systems beyond blood ties. At times, however, the script leans too heavily into repetition, restating motivations rather than trusting the audience to infer them. Some monologues embrace a heightened poetic theatricality that can occasionally feel at odds with the play’s grounded emotional realism.

Even so, Walking Each Other Home remains a thoughtful and heartfelt piece – one about reconciliation, memory and the difficult but necessary work of learning how to forgive. For all their flaws and pain, each of its characters is ultimately reaching toward hope.



WALKING EACH OTHER HOME

Old Red Lion Theatre

Reviewed on 30th April 2026

by Nasia Ntalla

Photography by Lidia Crisafulli


 

 

 

 

WALKING EACH OTHER HOME

WALKING EACH OTHER HOME

WALKING EACH OTHER HOME

King Lear

King Lear
★★★

Jack Studio Theatre

King Lear

King Lear

Jack Studio Theatre

Reviewed – 21st March 2019

★★★

 

“the Ed Miliband of Shakespeare: reliable, dependable, with the right words in the correct order but lacking that sense of purpose or timeliness”

 

I understand why people want to put on Shakespeare. It’s deep, people want to watch it, and it’s royalty free. What more could you want? But Shakespeare isn’t impressive like surgery is, it’s impressive like running a marathon is. Now, everyone has seen a marathon and if you want to make a statement you either need to do it exceptionally well, or you need to dress up as a Rhino and deliver your message.

And if putting on a Shakespeare isn’t like running a marathon, then it’s really like trying to be prime minister or a member of parliament. I want to know ‘why you?’ What does the version of Lear say different from the last? What extra insight do you have into our contemporary world? What do you believe in? This production of King Lear was the Ed Miliband of Shakespeare: reliable, dependable, with the right words in the correct order but lacking that sense of purpose or timeliness.

James Eley’s production at the impressive Jack Studio Theatre isn’t bad by any stretch of the imagination. The cuts to the script are sensible; the performances are credible, and the production tells the story. But this is all cone and no ice cream. It leaves an audience member wanting more and with their attention free to focus on minor defects of pace and accent. You will be sure you saw King Lear but not sure why.

Themes were suggested and hinted but never committed to. In the beginning, the play seemed to be set in a series of pubs with Lear and his daughters as landlords, and club owners waging a turf war. But then the ‘fool’ was more Commedia dell’arte, the fighting Tarantino and the soundtrack part classical and part brit pop. Edmund became Ada with lesbian relations, but nothing came of it. All good ideas but the question ‘why’ just swirls and swirls.

Lear isn’t a simple production, and between disguises and actors playing many parts, it’s easy to get lost. Our players did a reasonable job of telling the story and keeping it clear, although occasionally we got lost with some scenes delivered like the actors quickly needed to get to the end. The experience of Christopher Poke (Glouster) and Alan Booty (Lear) did shine as they slowed down and gave some timing to the scenes.

Ultimately this is not a bad show. Lear is long and challenging and complex and just getting through it is often enough as the text does so much. If you like Shakespeare then this is worth a shake. But if you’ve read King Lear, you know the rough story, and you’re looking for more then you might be disappointed. In the end, just like a politician, I would prefer a flawed play with something to say, rather than a polished production saying everything all at once.

 

Reviewed by William Nash

Photography courtesy Yard Players

 


King Lear

Jack Studio Theatre until 30th March

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:
Hobson’s Choice | ★★★★ | September 2018
Dracula | ★★★½ | October 2018
Radiant Vermin | ★★★★ | November 2018
Sweet Like Chocolate Boy | ★★★★★ | November 2018
Cinderella | ★★★ | December 2018
Gentleman Jack | ★★★★ | January 2019
Taro | ★★★½ | January 2019
As A Man Grows Younger | ★★★ | February 2019
Footfalls And Play | ★★★★★ | February 2019
The Silence Of Snow | ★★★ | March 2019

 

Click here to see more of our latest reviews on thespyinthestalls.com