Tag Archives: Dorothea Myer-Bennett

THE URMETAZOAN

★★★

Hampstead Theatre

THE URMETAZOAN

Hampstead Theatre

★★★

“a very human story about letting go”

“Where is everybody?”, asked the Italian-American physicist, Enrico Fermi, back in 1950. It is a question that goes back much further than that, but it is at the core of what is now known as the ‘Fermi Paradox’. Given the inconceivable number of stars in our Milky Way – and beyond – there is surely a high statistical likelihood that intelligent life exists somewhere out there; yet there is a total lack of evidence of it (a bit like the argument for time travel – if it exists, why has nobody come back to us from the future yet?). Most of the stars we see are much older than our sun, so advanced civilisations have had plenty of time to develop and colonize the galaxy. Yet where are they?

There are several theories, but none of them quell our innate desire to go out there and investigate. It is not necessarily at the core of our beings, but it is constantly bubbling away underneath. Similarly, the topic isn’t central to Alex Rugman’s new play, “The Urmetazoan”, but it’s a starting point. It focuses on two sisters; Alice (Dorothea Myer-Bennett) and Abigail (Meghan Treadway) who are worlds apart. They haven’t seen each other for seven years, but have come together for, perhaps, a last farewell. Alice is about to embark on a one-way mission into outer space.

We don’t know why they haven’t been in touch for so long. They weren’t ‘not talking’, as Alice observes, it’s just that they didn’t speak. Aspects of their relationship are touched upon but seldom followed through. When Alice says her departure – for ever – isn’t like death, Abigail disagrees. When Alice asks if she would prefer her to be dead on earth or alive ‘out there’, Abigail skirts the question. Rugman’s writing drives headlong into its various issues, but then sidesteps them somewhat in its quest for quirkiness. There are keen observations, nevertheless, and his portrait of the sisters’ bond is as sharp as it is authentic.

Myer-Bennett and Treadway match the dialogue with wonderfully natural performances, their lines and emotions overlapping in time to their shifting moods. Resentment and affection ebb and flow like tidal waves while verbal outbursts are pulled back by softer undertows and awkward pauses. The faltering connection is echoed by the frequent and abrupt blackouts that punctuate the short scenes. Anna Ledwich directs with wonderful stylistic flourishes. Each time the lights come back up, the sisters reappear in a slightly different time or space, as though in a parallel universe. Our own connection to the characters suffers slightly as a result, however, and the realism is sometimes broken. Yet ultimately the relatable performances draw us back in. We are like flies on the wall.

Alice isn’t just leaving her sister behind. There’s a guy. Will (Ben Allen), an astrobiologist who dropped out of the space mission. His initial presence is fleeting and insubstantial, but he returns later to flesh out the dynamics with more success. Alice has already left to prepare for the launch into space. Will has turned up at the house to collect a few things, to find Abigail alone. I shall say no more. The hasty unravelling veers towards the baffling and we start to lose sight of the characters’ motives. Myer-Bennett, however, beautifully portrays the fear that her imminent departure induces. Cold feet? They are positively frozen.

Tomás Palmer’s living room set has been gradually and surreptitiously stripped bare until we are eventually in the launch pad quarantine room. Alice and Abigail are separated by thick glass but that only emphasizes their closeness. There is reconciliation, maybe, but no real resolution. The questions posed at the beginning still loom large and unanswered. But that’s the way it has always been. “Where is everybody?”. The universe is so vast, are they all just too small to see? Like us. The title of the play refers to that impossibly unlikely link between basic single cell life and multi-cellular organisms that, over billions of years, gave rise to consciousness and intelligence. The ancestor of all life, as it were. An odd choice of title for Rugman’s play but, like the text, a good conversation piece. Myer-Bennett and Treadway are masters at capturing this conversational tone and Rugman builds well on this germ of an idea. What has evolved is a very human story about letting go.



THE URMETAZOAN

Hampstead Theatre

Reviewed on 24th September 2026

by Jonathan Evans

Photography by Rich Lakos


 

 

 

 

THE URMETAZOAN

THE URMETAZOAN

THE URMETAZOAN

🎭 A TOP SHOW IN OCTOBER 2024 🎭

WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ANNE FRANK

★★★★

Marylebone Theatre

WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ANNE FRANK at the Marylebone Theatre

★★★★

“this drama is pure, clean, rich with luxuries, well-engineered and superbly constructed”

In this visceral dissection of modern Judaism, what greets us first is designer Anna Fleischle’s super chic compact kitchen island: clean lines, cream with marble tops.

Plenty of space also to host that massive elephant in the room. But, in keeping with the metaphor, we’ll ignore that till later.

First, we’re expecting a dinner party, some light bantz, kosher nibbles, and plenty of nostalgia as two former best friends Debbie (Caroline Catz) and Shoshana (Dorothea Myer-Bennett) – both excellent – reunite after an uneasy separation. Both are burdened with regrets and simmering resentments.

Debbie’s husband and reluctant co-host Phil (Joshua Malina) is not happy. Debbie has an equivocal relationship with her Jewishness and he fears orthodox Shoshana will lure his wife away from her liberal life in Florida.

Shoshana and Yerucham (unexpected scene stealer Simon Yadoo) live in straitened circumstances in Jerusalem with eight – count ’em – eight children, working for God and the Jewish state. One couple has everything, the other couple feels superior.

At the beginning, on some point of etiquette, Shoshana says, “Your house, your rules. We don’t judge.”

And so follows two hours of brutal, hilarious, heart-rending judging, which goes both ways and escalates. Boy, does it escalate.

The play is based on Nathan Englander’s 2012 New Yorker article and the title refers to a game of trust – who would you ask to hide you away should the Nazis come?

The ridiculously talented Patrick Marber came in on an adaptation and the production carries many of his hallmarks, notably the humour, which is quippy and clever. Every cast member – especially Aaron Sorkin favourite Malina – has great comic sensibilities and they land the punchlines every time.

You’re never more than five minutes away from a doozy. Referring to his wife’s self-lacerating fascination with Jewish suffering, Phil calls the kitchen “a holocaust-themed food court”.

And so to the elephant. As director Marber and Englander were working on the adaptation, October 7 happened, the Hamas atrocity provoking Israel’s scorched earth reaction.

In response, Marber and Englander set up a couple of well-drilled, well-balanced examinations, the Floridians horrified by the slaughter, the Israelis talking about their right to exist.

It is a necessary addition, but uneasy. Throughout the play, the two couples mine their own – often moving – experiences to make their arguments, so a set piece debate about the rights and wrongs of a Middle East war arrives like a gatecrasher.

To introduce more division, we have Debbie and Phil’s slouchy, cynical son Trevor – a sharp cameo by Gabriel Howell. Something of a stoner and activist, his challenging of convention is so great he breaks the fourth wall to keep us in the loop, at one point urging the foursome to see if they can’t get through the next scene without fighting.

His point is perhaps the most telling. While the secular Jews and the Hasidic couple are taking lumps out of each other, indulging in the vanity of small differences, the world is burning. His generation is doomed while the adults in the room do nothing.

“We pray,” says pompous Yerucham, as a counter punch.

Like the kitchen, this drama is pure, clean, rich with luxuries, well-engineered and superbly constructed. Four heavyweights are on good form and take on a difficult theme with deft and precision. Also, did I mention, very, very funny.

Mazel tov, brilliant is what it is.


WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ANNE FRANK at the Marylebone Theatre

Reviewed on 14th October 2024

by Giles Broadbent

Photography by Mark Senior

 

 

 

 

 

 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

THE GOVERNMENT INSPECTOR | ★★★★ | May 2024
THE DREAM OF A RIDICULOUS MAN | ★★★★ | March 2024
A SHERLOCK CAROL | ★★★★ | November 2023
THE DRY HOUSE | ★★½ | April 2023

WHAT WE TALK

WHAT WE TALK

Click here to see our Recommended Shows page