Tag Archives: Shakespeare

JULIUS CAESAR

★★★★

Omnibus Theatre

JULIUS CAESAR

Omnibus Theatre

★★★★

“Cleverly reimagined, well crafted, and pulsing with style”

Over 400 years since its premiere during enormous political and social tension, Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’ still hits a nerve. Tangle Theatre Company’s African-inspired adaptation taps into the 21st century zeitgeist with charged intensity and cultural flair, delivering a punchy take on power, corruption and verbal warfare.

Caesar’s days are numbered, though he doesn’t know it: while Caesar courts kingship, rival Cassius sows the seeds of doubt, leading to a colossal betrayal by once loyal friend Brutus. But their bid to save the Republic backfires when the charismatic Mark Anthony swoops into the power vacuum. Suddenly Cassius and Brutus are on the wrong side of history, outmanoeuvred by a shrewd foe. Will it end in tragedy? You’ll have to find out!

Anna Coombs’ gutsy adaptation cuts straight to the play’s heart with bold, intelligent choices. Forty-plus roles become eight performed by five cast members; entire scenes and characters are slashed like Caesar on the Senate floor; expository speeches become brisk, visceral moments with deeper character insights. Several characters are condensed into a mysterious shamanic Soothsayer, steeped in symbolism, channelling ancient force, driving the plot, and offering commentary with refreshingly modern clarity. Die-hard Shakespeare fans needn’t worry, the iconic lines remain. The overall effect is fiery yet faithful and should be commended.

Coombs’ direction blends European and South African theatrical traditions through music, dance, multilingual storytelling and deconstructed staging. The Soothsayer anchors these elements through fourth-wall breaking critique and rhythmic talking drum accompaniment. Antifascist salutes add bite, though feel mismatched with Mark Antony’s loyalty to Caesar. Spatial choices could be sharper: aisle performances often go unlit or face away, and Brutus frequently turns his back during key exchanges, dulling the impact. Still, the production’s strengths outweigh the areas for improvement.

John Pfumojena’s richly textured score sets the tone with precision, layering nature sounds, vocalisations, and ambient textures to heighten tension. It’s an immersive accompaniment that complements the action and packs unexpected depth. Bawren Tavaziva’s choreography knits the production with fluid precision, at times understated, at others central. Drawing on natural and supernatural movements, and creating striking fight scenes, it feels fully integrated, breathing life into a script that risks feeling stale after four centuries.

Colin Falconer’s minimalist set design gives the stage a striking openness, with metal fencing beautifully catching the light while evoking danger, especially during the play’s frequent thunderstorms. Joe Hornsby’s lighting design contrasts naturalistic ombre washes with stark geometric lighting, flashes of lightning cutting through the darkness unexpectedly. A neon circle suggesting surveillance adds visual intrigue, before changing colour with split-second timing. However, the absence of aisle lighting occasionally undermines the immersive staging. Khalil Madovi’s sound design layers accompaniments, vocalisations, and percussion with precision. Thunderclaps and drumbeats synchronise perfectly with the action, amplifying dialogue with finesse. Falconer’s costume design reinforces the Afrocentric aesthetic, with the Soothsayer’s bold look paired with colourful prints to maintain cohesion with the rest of the cast. Simple yet effective costume changes track multiple roles and the play’s tonal transitions.

This all-Black ensemble delivers a strong collective performance with energy and cohesion. Yaw Osafo-Kantanka’s Soothsayer is magnetic, commanding the space with ease. The dynamic blend of acting, singing, dancing and drumming makes for a true triple (plus!) threat. Stepping in unexpectedly as Mark Antony, Samater Ahmed delivers a stirring performance with remarkable poise. The pacing and emotional nuance give the impression of a fully rehearsed performance. Roland Royal III delivers a layered Caesar that seduces and unsettles in equal measure.

Tangle’s ‘Julius Caesar’ brings bold vision and striking style to Shakespeare’s classic work. Cleverly reimagined, well crafted, and pulsing with style, you won’t want to miss out.



JULIUS CAESAR

Omnibus Theatre

Reviewed on 29th October 2025

by Hannah Bothelton

Photography by Stuart Martin


 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

THE ENDLESS HOTEL | ★½ | October 2025
CUL-DE-SAC | ★★★ | May 2025
BLOOD WEDDING | ★★★★ | May 2025
THE GUEST | ★★★★★ | April 2025
VANYA IS ALIVE | ★★★★ | February 2025

 

 

JULIUS CAESAR

JULIUS CAESAR

JULIUS CAESAR

AS YOU LIKE IT RADICAL RETELLING



Edinburgh International Festival

AS YOU LIKE IT RADICAL RETELLING

Edinburgh International Festival

“The movement of the piece is clumsy: clichés, borrowed gestures that feel appropriated rather than considered”

We enter a jewel-box theatre. Birds chirp, a troubadour sings. The red drape, gold fringe, and footlights evoke a sense of tradition. But the question lingers: will this truly be a radical retelling? Calling something radical sets expectations.

Shakespeare is always ripe for reinvention; few modern productions dust off the doublet and tights. Most of the chunky medallions on chains look better on drag queens in contemporary theatre than on Hamlet.

Eight minutes late, actor–playwright Cliff Cardinal walks on. Nervous, he tells us he was born on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota and grew up in Canada. Pine Ridge is one of the poorest areas of the United States. We are not told this.

Cardinal has been asked to do a land acknowledgement – but here, in Scotland? Who are we acknowledging – the Picts? He adds that this acknowledgement contains all the Easter eggs for the performance. We listen carefully.

Except it isn’t really an acknowledgement at all. It’s a stand-up: part confession, mostly provocation. Cardinal admits he dislikes land acknowledgements, calling them pointless. He riffs on stolen land, privilege, and trauma. It feels like rough, unpolished Fringe material. At thirteen minutes, I realise this may not be Shakespeare at all. Perhaps a radical not-telling of As You Like It. I was right.

Fifteen minutes in, someone leaves. The actor notes it. More leave at twenty-five, thirty, and thirty-five minutes. Audience unease grows. Some are thrilled, others distinctly not. This is not the theatre we expected with a proscenium arch. It is certainly not the safe, cathartic theatre space Aristotle once praised.

We are told we are privileged, that our buildings were built with blood. We hear about intergenerational trauma versus wealth, about allies who do nothing, about oil, history, and religion. It is scattershot: fragments, half-thoughts, provocations. He forgets lines, wanders off stage, and re-enters. Each exit or fall out of character is another chance to escape. More do.

By forty minutes, the house lights are cut – perhaps because walk-outs were anticipated. I’m sure they were. The performance begins to feel like a test: who will stay, who will resist?

An older man with a cane tries to leave. He protests that he feels tricked. He has trouble leaving, and Cardinal supporters in the audience shout the audience member down with expletives and “Get Out.” I’m suddenly in that play we read in middle school, where a group condemns and stones one of themselves. You know the one. And I wonder, is this the thing that fixes the atrocities of the past?

Once the old man has gone, Cardinal claims he was frightened of him, and thanks those who defended him, leaving others to be condemned silently. All of this feels staged. Frightened by the old man, the one with the cane who could hardly walk out of the theatre and worked hard to get into it?

More people trickle out. The academic beside me, weary after a day of writing with only one paragraph to show for it, came hoping for Shakespeare. Instead, she left, perhaps to read some at home.

The movement of the piece is clumsy: clichés, borrowed gestures that feel appropriated rather than considered. When the curtain finally rises at Cardinal’s command, it reveals nothing but lighting rigs and boxes. Another contrivance. The performance is Cardinal himself. He tells us there is no As You Like It. That it was all a dupe. That he has never read Shakespeare’s play.

It ends with stories of his family, whom he describes as bad-assed survivors. Aren’t we all? At least we survived this performance.

Reviewing such a show, one is tempted to do as Cardinal did: talk about something else and avoid the task at hand. Crow’s Theatre and Cliff Cardinal’s As You Like It: A Radical Retelling is neither radical nor a retelling nor Shakespeare. The marketing promised Shakespeare with a ruff – classic yet fresh. It is neither. Cardinal himself says, “If you don’t like it, ask for a refund. And don’t tell anyone what happened tonight.”

Perhaps he wants to trick tomorrow’s audience, too. But honesty would have been more radical than misdirection – especially when dealing with such important themes.

My advice? Take the refund. Stay home. Read the Bard. Tell yourself the story you want to hear – and think about how to make the world better.



AS YOU LIKE IT RADICAL RETELLING

Edinburgh International Festival

Reviewed on 20th August 2025 at Church Hill Theatre

by William Shakespeare – The Bard who was not heard. Two can play at Cardinal’s game.

Photography by Dahlia Katz

 

 

 

 

 

 

AS YOU LIKE IT RADICAL

AS YOU LIKE IT RADICAL

AS YOU LIKE IT RADICAL