Tag Archives: Rachel O’Neill

STUNTMAN

★★★★

UK Tour

STUNTMAN

The Place

★★★★

“opens with swagger and closes with vulnerability”

Many a young boy dreams of being a stuntman – until reality throws the first punch. ‘Stuntman’ is a tough yet tender take on violence and masculinity, examining what it means to be male in modern society through a compelling mix of physicality, dance, speech and sign language. It swings with force and feeling and would be a knockout save for an unusual structure.

Presented by the Scottish company, SUPERFAN, and based on true events, we meet Sadiq and Fox executing violent stunts while exploring how they got into stunt performance. Scenes which start off playful and stylised become more extreme and realistic. The intervening stories dig deeper, deconstructing masculinity with fierce vulnerability. By the end, you’ll question your own conception of manhood and wonder who really benefits from society’s expectations.

Co-devised by Pete Lannon, Fox Banks and Sadiq Ali, ‘Stuntman’ has a loose narrative, feeling like a series of chapters linked by a common thread. Each section explores male-on-male violence, culminating in a heartbreaking reflection on male self-expression and disconnection. The final sequence of a distressed Fox and Sadiq repeatedly leaning on one another before pushing the other away shows this with devastating clarity. It’s a timely, powerful piece. That said, there’s far more movement than speech, with the almost endless murder scenes (each repeating “See you in hell motherf*****!”) starting to feel superfluous. I long for more dialogue to really dissect the emotional core, especially Sadiq’s perspective which is relatively underexplored. Though perhaps that’s the point: all too often, men are socialised to lack the vocabulary.

A devised piece directed by Lannon, ‘Stuntman’ has an autobiographical, immersive quality: we find our seats while the men laddishly fool around; we are addressed directly and even ‘shot at’ at points (don’t worry, there are no weapons). There are clever contrasts between Fox’s two fight monologues, one as glorified and stylised as a movie scene, the other starker and more honest. The river scene hits hard, as Fox and Sadiq hauntingly repeat ‘I didn’t know what to do’ while apologising to each other – heart wrenchingly beautiful. The pacing could be tightened, with some overly long pauses losing momentum at points.

The choreography (Lucy Ireland) steps in when words fail, sweeping, striking and reaching for an elusive form of expression and cleverly incorporating BSL interpreter, Iain Hodgetts. The score (Richy Carey) mixes music with fight effects and ambient sounds, layering reality upon the otherwise abstract scenography (Rachel O’Neill) and transforming movement into a tightly executed dance. O’Neill’s set evokes a boxing ring, complete with canvas. The lighting design (Michaella Fee) mixes brash bulbs with a suffusive tonal palette. The costumes build up and then strip away the machismo.

Fox Banks and Sadiq Ali are totally in sync throughout, giving each other a quick nod before launching into the next section. Ali is a beautiful dancer, deftly executing impressively acrobatic and subtly nuanced moves. Banks demonstrates power and perseverance, especially when repeatedly hitting the deck at the end of a rope. Both deliver earnest and moving monologues, pushing the boundaries before straining at the limits of society’s expectations.

‘Stuntman’ opens with swagger and closes with vulnerability – a brave, bare-knuckle dive into modern masculinity. Don’t miss it, even if I’d swap some combat for more connection.



STUNTMAN

The Place

Reviewed on 4th October 2025

by Hannah Bothelton

Photography by Brian Hartley


 

Previously reviewed at this venue:

JAZZ CONVERSATIONS | ★★★★★ | September 2024

 

 

STUNTMAN

STUNTMAN

STUNTMAN

Like Animals

Like Animals

★★★

Summerhall Old Lab

Like Animals

Like Animals

Summerhall Old Lab

Reviewed – 11th August 2019

★★★

 

“in a play about communication, its message at times became unclear”

 

Can humans and animals have conversations? If something is forced to speak, does what they then say hold meaning? At what point does communication fail?

These are all questions that were posed in the innovative two-hander ‘Like Animals’. The piece was created and performed by the real life couple Pete Lannon and Kim Donohoe. The performance intertwined snippets of them talking about their relationship, with true case studies of animal experiments. The examples used were of Irene Pepperberg who taught her parrot, Alex, over 250 words, and Margaret Howe Lovatt who tried to make Peter, a dolphin, speak. While these events occurred over fifty years ago, the questions raised still have relevance. Lannon and Donohoe multi role as themselves and the animals and their trainers. This was made clear through distinctions in body language, voice and simple stylistic choices such as a sprinkle of feathers to symbolise the parrot and a splash of water to the face to portray the dolphin. This had the effect of making the line between human and non-human appear fine as we watched the actors go in and out of character.

The lighting (Benny Goodman) and sound (Michael John McCarthy) was consistently used to good effect throughout. The lighting was intricate, switching between disco colours and precise spotlights to create different atmospheres. Additionally, music and animal sound effects made the audience feel as if they were underwater or in a cage.

The play worked on a kind of parallel structure, flitting between the lives of the animals and the actors. Often lines that were said to the animals in training such as to say the phrase ‘better’, were also used between the couple. A poignant example of this was when Lannon said ‘I love you’ and was asked repeatedly to ‘do better’. This became uncomfortable to watch when applied to humans, highlighting the double standard between how we treat animals in comparison to others.

While the message of the piece was at some points clear, at others it became murky and confused. The direction (Ellie Dubois) used a lot of long pauses and had the actors break the fourth wall. The most obvious use of this was in the line ‘shall we move on to the next bit now’. This constant referencing to the play itself became forced and self-indulgent. The really interesting part of the narrative – what happened to the animals themselves – was skimmed over in favour of an abstract explorations of the real couple’s relationship. I left wishing to know more about the experiments themselves, but instead the play assumed that this was common knowledge.

This show raised important questions about inter-species connections. In an age where we are more conscious of our impact on the planet, this play analysed our need to connect with each other and our world. Ironically, in a play about communication, its message at times became unclear. At the end, perhaps style overtook content, and a more straightforward delivery might have resulted in a stronger message.

 

Reviewed by Emily Morris

Photography by Mihaela Bhodlovic

 


Like Animals

Summerhall Old Lab until 25th August as part of Edinburgh Festival Fringe 2019

 

 

Click here to see more of our latest reviews on thespyinthestalls.com