Tag Archives: Sean Cavanagh

DOG MOM

★★

Southwark Playhouse Borough

DOG MOM

Southwark Playhouse Borough

★★

“The strong performances do rescue the play, but we never fully embrace it”

There is no shortage of apps out there that offer to translate your pet dog’s barks, growls and whimpers into English. Writer, director and actor Tate Elizabeth Hanyok has done the job for us in her play “Dog Mom” in which two of the cast play canine characters. Replicating the animal physicality, they speak in plain English (of the Downtown Brooklyn variety). With shades of cartoonist Gary Larson’s comedic perception, we get a feel of what they might be really thinking. It is played for laughs, but there is a lot we can learn from their vocabulary and, in turn, help make the world a be a better place.

Sarita (Vinita Belani) is at a bit of a standstill in her life. On the rebound from a relationship that failed to yield children (an unexplained hysterectomy is cited at one point), she is trying to rebuild her life by moving into a cramped New York tenement. Her prying and meddling neighbour, Nell (a garrulous Joanna Holden), calls it the ‘commune’. Taking this as an invitation, a stray golden retriever follows Sarita into her home. Unwelcome and unnamed, the dog is marched off to the local pound, but when the only alternative is an early end to the poor pooch, Sarita reluctantly adopts it. So far so ‘Colin from Accounts’, but without the rom-com factor. Patty Gallagher astutely personifies the dog (now christened Foster) with a spry energy and attention to its quirky mannerisms and presumed thought processes. Nell has her own dog, the more softheaded Rubens (played with equal gusto by Tom Barnes). Circling the odd couple of couples is Jarreau Antoine who nimbly plays a variety of characters; including a vet, a dogcatcher and a flexible feline who cannot help but antagonise the mutts it looks down upon.

The focus is on the comedy in the first act, establishing the personalities under the fast-paced direction of Ajay Chowdhury. Behind Sean Cavanagh’s straightforward set, the back wall is dominated by Aarushi’s video creations depicting Brooklyn’s brownstone backdrops. Film theme tunes pepper the action in short bursts; sometimes whimsical, sometimes clichéd. The second act, however, sees the play’s quirkiness shift into something resembling a self-help manual, while a visit to the vets sets the story in a predictably mawkish direction. The dogs are tiring now of forever chasing things – a metaphor for Sarita’s realisation that she should perhaps stop chasing perfection, meaning, her dreams… herself even. She hasn’t rescued the dog; the dog has rescued her. The platitudes are laid on thick and fast, and an earlier rift between Sarita and Nell is smoothed over with a second coating of schmaltzy earnestness.

By taking itself a touch too seriously, “Dog Mom” weakens the messages that are better served with humour. The more it is spelled out, the more the spell is broken. There are moments when Hanyok’s writing becomes an exercise rather than an entertainment, and we feel we should be taking notes for our ‘compare and contrast’ homework assignment. The strong performances do rescue the play, but unlike Sarita’s loving acceptance of her adopted dog, we never fully embrace it.



DOG MOM

Southwark Playhouse Borough

Reviewed on 16th October 2026

by Jonathan Evans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOG MOM REVIEW

DOG MOM

DOG MOM

DOG MOM

DEATH COMES TO PEMBERLEY

★★★

UK Tour

DEATH COMES TO PEMBERLEY

Theatre Royal Windsor

★★★

“for the most part the characters are gently engaging”

When P D James wrote “Death Comes to Pemberley”, she prefaced the novel with an apology to Jane Austen for ‘involving her beloved Elizabeth in the trauma of a murder investigation’. She surmised that had Austen wished to dwell on such ‘odious subjects’, she would have written the story herself, and ‘done it better’. The general reception to her novel disputed her modest self-criticism, however, and her sequel to ‘Pride and Prejudice’, written in the style of Jane Austen, was a blend of James’ signature crime writing and Austen’s sardonic romance. It wasn’t long before it was adapted for television, but it has taken a few more years for it to reach the stage.

Duncan Abel and Rachel Wagstaff’s adaptation is a remarkably faithful interpretation of the P D James mystery novel. It is the year 1803, and Darcy and Elizabeth have been married for six years and are comfortable in their orderly world on their idyllic estate of Pemberley. On the eve of their annual ball there is a storm. Elizabeth’s younger sister, Lydia, bursts onto the scene screaming blue murder. A corpse is found in the woods, cradled by Lydia’s blood-soaked husband. It appears to be an easily solved whodunnit. It isn’t, of course. That would make for a very short play. And this adaptation – which opened at the Mill at Sonning prior to its current tour – is most certainly on the long side.

It is not an easy story to adapt, yet Abel and Wagstaff do justice to both Jane Austen and P D James with a cast that authentically recreates the characters. There is inevitably an overreliance on exposition which causes the story to drag occasionally, but for the most part the characters are gently engaging. All eyes are bound to be on James Bye, fresh from his television persona as Martin in ‘Eastenders’. But Bye is unrecognisable, sensitively portraying the solid Fitzwilliam Darcy, adding an appealing vulnerability to his haughtiness. Jamie-Rose Duke places Elizabeth Darcy ahead of her time, unafraid to stand up to her husband but unashamed to stand by him too. The couple seem to be the only ones on the side of the prime murder suspect, George Wickham. He’s a dodgy fellow who does himself no favours, portrayed with infectious energy by Sam Woodhams. Woodhams also doubles as the terminally ill Will Bidwell – quite ironic given the role Will plays in the mystery, but I shall give nothing away.

As skeletons come out of the closet, the plot thickens, relationships tangle, intrigues intertwine, and class divides blur. The atmosphere is seldom fully realised, however, and there is little in the way of suspense. And an awful lot of lines are lost among problems of projection (James Bye is an exception, as is Sarah Berger’s matriarchal Lady Catherine de Bourgh). Director Jonathan O’Boyle ably steers the narrative through the woods, but never really breaks from a trot; particularly in the first act. After interval the pace quickens to a canter, but we want to feel as though we are galloping towards the conclusion. A sense of location is often missing too. Mike Robertson’s lighting attempts to lead us from the salons into the woods, but too much overspill leaves us hovering between the two.

Although it obviously helps, you don’t need to be familiar with Jane Austen’s ‘Pride and prejudice’ (or P D James’ sequel) to appreciate the story being told here. There is plenty to hang onto as the strands of the storyline come together and backstories are revealed. But we are hanging on precariously – the hold on our attention lacking the strength to keep us gripped throughout. It could be a wonderful blend of whodunnit and period drama but, despite the commitment of a fine ensemble cast, it is left swinging between the two, not entirely sure which to reach out for.



DEATH COMES TO PEMBERLEY

Theatre Royal Windsor then UK Tour continues

Reviewed on 25th July 2025

by Jonathan Evans

Photography by Pamela Raith

 

 

 


 

 

 

Last ten shows reviewed at this venue:

DOUBTING THOMAS | ★★★½ | June 2025
FAR FROM THE MADDING CROWD | ★★ | March 2025
PRIDE & PREJUDICE (SORT OF) | ★★★ | February 2025
BOYS FROM THE BLACKSTUFF | ★★★★ | January 2025
FILUMENA | ★★★★ | October 2024
THE GATES OF KYIV | ★★★★ | September 2024
ACCOLADE | ★★★½ | June 2024
OH WHAT A LOVELY WAR | ★★★★ | April 2024
CLOSURE | ★★★★ | February 2024
THE GREAT GATSBY | ★★★ | February 2024

 

 

DEATH COMES TO PEMBERLEY

DEATH COMES TO PEMBERLEY

DEATH COMES TO PEMBERLEY